Back

Comparative analysis of morphological and acoustic correlates of bush-cricket tympanic membranes

Islam, M. N.; Holmes, L. B.; Rooke, D.; Sarria-S, F. A.; Montealegre-Z, F.

2025-11-30 biophysics
10.1101/2025.11.11.687687 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bush-crickets exhibit remarkable auditory diversity, having the ears in the forelegs, where the tympana could be exposed or covered by cuticular flaps known as auditory pinnae. These tympanic membranes receive sound either directly or internally via an acoustic tracheal tube. Despite extensive research on auditory tuning, the relationships between tympanal structure, body size, and acoustic traits remain unclear. In this study, {micro}CT reconstructions with AI-assisted segmentation and phylogenetically informed regressions across 18 bush-cricket species were used to investigate how tympanal surface area and mean cross-sectional thickness relate to body size, carrier frequency, and the presence of auditory pinnae. Tympanal surface area scaled positively with body size, whereas thickness was independent of size. Carrier frequency decreased with increasing body size but showed no direct association with tympanal properties. Among 14 species with auditory pinnae, tympanal dimensions showed no correlation with peak cavity resonance frequency, indicating semi-independent evolution of pinna cavity and tympanal traits. Across species, pinnae did not alter tympanal surface area, although unilateral pinnae were linked to thicker tympana. Within these unilateral species, the pinna-covered tympanum remained consistently larger in area but thinner than the exposed side. Overall, these findings indicate that tympanal evolution reflects a balance of scaling constraints and localised effects of auditory pinnae. Summary StatementThe tympanal morphology in bush-crickets reflects a balance of scaling and pinna effects. Surface area scales with body size and unilateral pinnae generate consistent asymmetries.

Published in Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (predicted rank #24) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.2%
2
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.0%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.1%
4
Integrative Organismal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.9%
6
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 19%
5.0%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 24%
5.0%
9
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
10
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
11
Open Biology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
13
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
14
Journal of Anatomy
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
15
Marine Ecology Progress Series
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
16
Open Research Europe
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
17
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%
20
Experimental Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%