Dynamic Lymphocyte Recovery Patterns Predict 90-Day Mortality in Sepsis: A Machine Learning-Enhanced Analysis of the MIMIC-IV Cohort
Huang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, Z.; Chen, Q.; Gao, Y.
Show abstract
BackgroundSepsis-induced immunosuppression, characterized by lymphopenia, is associated with adverse outcomes. We aimed to identify distinct lymphocyte recovery patterns in patients with sepsis, evaluate their association with mortality, and develop a machine learning model to enhance prediction MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included adult patients with sepsis and initial lymphopenia (Absolute Lymphocyte Count [ALC] < 1.0 x 10L/L) from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database. We defined three lymphocyte recovery patterns: "Persistent Suppression," "Partial Recovery," and "Complete Recovery." The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. Multivariable Cox models were used to assess the association between recovery patterns and mortality. An Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model was developed to predict 90-day mortality. Results90-day mortality was highest in the Persistent Suppression group (49.1%) versus Partial (41.3%) and Complete Recovery (35.7%) groups (p<0.001). Persistent Suppression remained an independent predictor of mortality (adjusted Hazard Ratio 1.31, 95% CI 1.10-1.55). The XGBoost model achieved superior discrimination (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve [AUROC]=0.767) over traditional scores. SHAP analysis confirmed that dynamic features, including lymphocyte recovery metrics, were key model drivers. The model also demonstrated robust performance across various clinical subgroups (e.g., age, disease severity). ConclusionsThe trajectory of lymphocyte recovery following sepsis onset is an independent prognostic marker. Failure to restore lymphocyte counts is strongly associated with increased long-term mortality. Integrating this dynamic immunological feature into machine learning algorithms significantly enhances predictive accuracy, offering a promising tool for real-time risk stratification.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis 96%
- Clustering ICU patients with sepsis based on the patterns of their circulating biomarkers: a secondary analysis of the CAPTAIN prospective multicenter cohort study 96%
- Development and validation of a cellular host response test as an early diagnostic for sepsis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting mortality in SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) positive patients in the inpatient setting using a Novel Deep Neural Network 94%
- Predicting Prognosis in COVID-19 Patients using Machine Learning and Readily Available Clinical Data 93%
- Personalized Predictive Models for Symptomatic COVID-19 Patients Using Basic Preconditions: Hospitalizations, Mortality, and the Need for an ICU or Ventilator 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exposing Limitations of Clinical Laboratory Tests in COVID-19 and the Promise of Immunological Biomarkers 95%
- Machine Learning Identifies Complicated Sepsis Trajectory and Subsequent Mortality Based on 20 Genes in Peripheral Blood Immune Cells at 24 Hours post ICU admission 95%
- Apoptotic cells for therapeutic use in cytokine storm associated with sepsis 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.