Back

Dynamic Lymphocyte Recovery Patterns Predict 90-Day Mortality in Sepsis: A Machine Learning-Enhanced Analysis of the MIMIC-IV Cohort

Huang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, Z.; Chen, Q.; Gao, Y.

2025-11-13 allergy and immunology
10.1101/2025.11.11.25339967 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSepsis-induced immunosuppression, characterized by lymphopenia, is associated with adverse outcomes. We aimed to identify distinct lymphocyte recovery patterns in patients with sepsis, evaluate their association with mortality, and develop a machine learning model to enhance prediction MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included adult patients with sepsis and initial lymphopenia (Absolute Lymphocyte Count [ALC] < 1.0 x 10L/L) from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database. We defined three lymphocyte recovery patterns: "Persistent Suppression," "Partial Recovery," and "Complete Recovery." The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. Multivariable Cox models were used to assess the association between recovery patterns and mortality. An Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model was developed to predict 90-day mortality. Results90-day mortality was highest in the Persistent Suppression group (49.1%) versus Partial (41.3%) and Complete Recovery (35.7%) groups (p<0.001). Persistent Suppression remained an independent predictor of mortality (adjusted Hazard Ratio 1.31, 95% CI 1.10-1.55). The XGBoost model achieved superior discrimination (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve [AUROC]=0.767) over traditional scores. SHAP analysis confirmed that dynamic features, including lymphocyte recovery metrics, were key model drivers. The model also demonstrated robust performance across various clinical subgroups (e.g., age, disease severity). ConclusionsThe trajectory of lymphocyte recovery following sepsis onset is an independent prognostic marker. Failure to restore lymphocyte counts is strongly associated with increased long-term mortality. Integrating this dynamic immunological feature into machine learning algorithms significantly enhances predictive accuracy, offering a promising tool for real-time risk stratification.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.6%
3
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.6%
4
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
5
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.1%
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
9
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
11
Clinical and Experimental Immunology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Journal of Leukocyte Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
16
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
27
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
30
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%