Optimizing Audit and feedbaCk To Implement eVidence-based prAcTices in primary health carE in Nepal, Mozambique, Tanzania and China (ACTIVATE trial): rationale and design of a factorial randomized trial
Luo, H.; Mussa, H. K.; Zhu, X.; Zhao, Q.; Cai, Y.; Wu, D.; Chen, J.; Wang, X.; Li, C.-C.; Wang, D.; Zhang, M.; Wang, R.; Koju, P.; Shrestha, S. S.; Shrestha, R.; Karmacharya, B. M.; Chaquisse, E. E.; Cuco, R. M.; Kanduma, E. L.; Ramiro, I.; Shrestha, A.; Chan, S. S. C.; Xu, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe ability of primary health workers (PHWs) to practice in accordance with evidence-based guidelines and norms is a critical component of improving the quality of primary healthcare. Implementation science seeks to promote the routine use of evidence-based practices in healthcare by identifying barriers and facilitators to their implementation, and by developing strategies such as audit and feedback (AnF) to overcome these barriers. However, the effects of AnF show significant heterogeneity across studies, so this research focuses on the validity of AnF components and the optimal combinations of these components through head-to-head comparisons. MethodsDuring the preparation phase, we will conduct a preliminary exploration to optimize AnF intervention aimed at improving the quality of primary healthcare. This will involve identifying key candidate components and levels of the AnF intervention, understanding the mechanisms of action, and assessing the resource constraints associated with implementing AnF in primary healthcare (PHC) facilities. This will be achieved through expert consultation and a Best-Worst Scaling (BWS) questionnaire survey. In the optimization phase, we will use the gold standard method of Unannounced Standardized Patients (USP) to assess the quality of primary healthcare for diabetes and hypertension, focusing on the accuracy and standardization of consultation, examination, diagnosis, and treatment procedures in comparison to evidence-based practices, across Nepal, Mozambique, Tanzania, and China. A factorial design randomized controlled trial will be conducted to determine how feedback on care quality can be delivered to PHWs in order to optimize its impact on healthcare quality improvement. To achieve this, the factorial trial will incorporate four key AnF components, each at two levels, resulting in a total of sixteen intervention groups. PHWs will be randomly assigned to these groups. DiscussionThis study will provide an empirical foundation for using AnF to improve the quality of primary healthcare in developing countries, while also enhancing and complementing the existing AnF theory. This study focuses on the optimization of the important implementation strategy of AnF in implementation science, contributing a universal research paradigm to the field. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06480487. Registered 27 December 2024, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06480487.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 96%
- Implementation Science Protocol for a participatory, theory-informed implementation research programme in the context of health system strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa (ASSET-ImplementER) 96%
- Face-to-face interventions to encourage enrolment in cardiac rehabilitation; a scoping review protocol 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact of Clinical Audits on Improving the Effectiveness of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) CARE in Primary Health Centers. A Comprehensive Pre-post analysis through Multi-layered Intervention: The ICAE-DM CARE study protocol 95%
- Impact of health systems interventions in primary health settings on type 2 diabetes care and health outcomes among adults in West Africa: a systematic review protocol 95%
- Essential Indicators of Quality in Primary Care Settings: An Evidence-Based, Structured, Expert Approach 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementing essential diagnostics-learning from essential medicines: A scoping review 95%
- Examining National Health Insurance Fund Members’ preferences and trade-offs for the attributes of contracted outpatient facilities in Kenya: a discrete choice experiment 94%
- Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: a scoping review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 95%
- Strategies and Tools for electronic health records and physician workflow alignment: A scoping review protocol 94%
- The PUPPY Study - Protocol for a Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study Exploring Problems Coordinating and Accessing Primary Care for Attached and Unattached Patients Exacerbated During the COVID-19 Pandemic Year 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating Community-Based Health Information System with a Patient-Centered Medical Home to Improve Care of Patients with Hypertension: A Longitudinal Observational Study Protocol 95%
- The Impact for implementing Balanced Scorecard in Health Care Organizations: A Systematic Review 95%
- A Systematic Review: The Dimensions and Indicators utilized in the Performance Evaluation of Health Care Organizations- An Implication during COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.