Back

Absence of posterior commissure and sub-commissural organ precedes encephalocele development in a new mouse model

Chan, H. N.; Savery, D.; Chakraborty, S.; Wenzlitschke, N.; Rocha, P. P.; Copp, A.

2025-12-04 developmental biology
10.1101/2025.11.10.687701 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Encephalocele is a congenital defect involving herniation of the meninges, with or without brain tissue, outside the skull. Although traditionally considered a neural tube defect (NTD) alongside anencephaly and open spina bifida (myelomeningocele), encephalocele typically shows well-formed brain tissue, and is likely to represent a later-arising, post-neurulation developmental anomaly, with a different pathogenic mechanism from the open NTDs. A detailed understanding of encephalocele pathogenesis requires experimental studies and, recently, we developed a new mouse model in which the genes encoding FGF3, 4 and 15 are over-expressed in the embryonic day (E) 9.5 brain. Encephalocele subsequently develops as a broad forebrain-midbrain swelling, visible from E11.5, that resolves by birth into a focal brain herniation resembling human parieto-occipital encephalocele. A structural analysis of the brain in mutant embryos reveals absence of the posterior commissure and sub-commissural organ, and at later stages the pineal gland. These structures normally develop just rostral to the forebrain-midbrain boundary, and Pax6 immuno-histochemistry demonstrates that this boundary remains intact in the mutant embryos. Histological analysis reveals a more general change in tissue composition of the neural tube roof in the forebrain-midbrain region, with diminished thickness of the neuroepithelium and increased thickness of the overlying layer, including the non-neural ectoderm (future epidermis). We conclude that the posterior commissure and sub-commissural organ, previously implicated in hydrocephalus, may also be fundamental for development of the earlier-arising brain malformation, encephalocele.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.