Back

Molecular Evolutionary Analysis for Estimating the Strength of Fluctuating Selection among Individuals (FSI)

Gu, X.

2025-11-11 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.11.10.687654 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fluctuating selection among individuals (FSI) refers to any mutation that exhibits different fitness effects among individuals. Thus, the selection nature of a mutation (deleterious, neutral, or beneficial) should be interpreted by the means of the population average. For instance, a neutral mutation on average could be slightly deleterious in some individuals, and slightly beneficial in others. It has been recently demonstrated that the effect of FSI is important in molecular evolution especially when the effective population size (Ne) is not small. Intriguingly, a novel pattern of molecular evolution called selection duality, i.e., mutations that are statistically slightly beneficial are subject to a negative selection, emerges under the condition that selective advantage is less than FSI. While FSI sheds some lights on the long-term neutralist-selectionist debate, an immediate question is how to calculate the strength of FSI-genetic drift relative to the Ne-genetic drift. In this article we develop a statistical method the relative FSI strength (F): if F is close to 0, the Ne-genetic drift is dominant; whereas the FSI-genetic drift is dominant if F is close to 1. One may tentatively set F=0.5 as an empirical criterion to weigh between those two genetic drifts. Our case study showed that the relative FSI-strength F is over 0.5 in most species, suggesting that the FSI-genetic drift, rather than the Ne-drift, plays a major role in metazoan genome evolution.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.3%
3
Journal of Molecular Evolution
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.3%
5
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.2%
6
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.1%
8
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 20%
3.5%
10
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
12
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
14
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
15
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
18
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
21
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
22
Theoretical Population Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
26
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
30
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%