Back

Optical tweezers combined with FRET tension sensor reveal force-dependent vinculin dynamics

Dubois, C.; Cohen, R. I.; Boustany, N. N.; Westbrook, N.

2026-03-19 biophysics
10.1101/2025.11.10.687568 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Methods to visualize and quantify the molecular responses of cells to local forces exerted at adhesions are crucial to elucidate how physical forces control cellular behavior. Of the many proteins involved in focal adhesions, vinculin plays a key role in mediating force-sensitive processes. Here, we combined optical tweezers and Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) microscopy to measure the intensity and FRET efficiency of the vinculin tension sensor, VinTS, in response to a force. Fibroblasts expressing VinTS formed adhesions on fibronectin-coated, 3m-diameter, polystyrene beads. As the beads were displaced by the cell, we applied an optical trap to counteract this movement and increase the traction force required by the cell to maintain the bead displacement. The optical trap stiffness varied from zero (no laser) up to 0.26 pN/nm. In this range, the median bead displacement after 5 min was ~200nm in all trapping conditions inducing counteracting forces in the 10-100pN range. To maintain this displacement, vinculin recruitment increased (up to 35% in relative intensity at high stiffness) while tension increased but more moderately (1-2% decrease in absolute FRET efficiency). For higher trap stiffness, the main response was an increase in vinculin recruitment, while the tension did not increase significantly. The increase in vinculin intensity was correlated with the decrease in FRET efficiency at 0.26 pN/nm but not at lower stiffness. Thus, the presence of the high stiffness optical trap over 5 min appears to induce a positive correlation between vinculin recruitment and vinculin tension. In a few instances, vinculin puncta migrated a few microns away from the bead exceeding the bead movement speed while experiencing an increase in both vinculin intensity and tension. Taken together, the results suggest that combining an optical trap with vinculin tension measurements uncovers novel vinculin dynamics in the presence of a force.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.3%
2
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.3%
3
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.4%
4
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
5
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
6
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
7
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.6%
10
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 28%
2.1%
13
The European Physical Journal E
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
14
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
Soft Matter
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
17
Cytoskeleton
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.9%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
24
European Biophysics Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
25
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Journal of the Royal Society Interface
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
27
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
28
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
30
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%