Physical determinants of perceived vibration intensity: Insights from haptic feedback given at the wrist
Bonnet, S.; Watkins, R.; Ericsson, R.; Daumas, H.; Ackerley, R.
Show abstract
Understanding how controlled mechanical vibrations applied to the skin translate into tactile sensations is key in advancing our understanding of somatosensory perception and using this in haptic applications. Prior research has established psychophysical thresholds and discrimination levels for vibrotactile stimuli, yet less is known about tactile intensity perception. Understanding the signaling of tactile intensity and how mechanical dynamics of skin transmission shape this is critical for providing effective graded haptic feedback. We investigated how modifying the frequency, amplitude, and waveform shape of vibration at the wrist influence free ratings of perceived tactile intensity. Two accelerometers recorded mechanical signals: one embedded within the vibrotactile wristband and another placed 1 cm away on the skin, enabling tracking of vibration propagation through the tissue. We found that perceived intensity was determined by all three parameters, but each had a distinct role. Vibration frequency exerted a non-linear influence, with perceived intensity peaking around 150 Hz, which also corresponded to the actuators mechanical resonance, with lower secondary peaks for square and sawtooth waveforms in-line with vibratory harmonics. Moreover, square waves were consistently rated as most intense. Vibration amplitude provided a consistent scaling of perceived strength, which was strongly correlated with both actuator and skin acceleration, indicating that skin-transmitted accelerations retained the stimulation profile. We find that the skin acts as a non-linear, frequency-dependent mechanical filter that selectively modulates vibration transmission. Understanding these determinants provides insights for the design of wearable haptic devices and how these can be used to provide graded feedback during tactile interactions.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Closed-loop stimulation of lateral cervical spinal cord in upper-limb amputees to enable sensory discrimination 95%
- When mechanical engineering inspired from physiology improves postural-related somatosensory processes 94%
- Multisensory interactions on auditory and somatosensory information in expert pianists 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Feeling Senseless Sensations: A Crossmodal study of mismatching tactile and virtual visual experience 94%
- Estimating Speed-Accuracy Trade-offs to Evaluate and Understand Closed-Loop Prosthesis Interfaces 93%
- Influence of feedback transparency on motor imagery neurofeedback performance: the contribution of agency 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The contribution of stimulating multiple body parts simultaneously to the illusion of owning an entire artificial body 94%
- Comparison of TENS electrodes and textile electrodes for electrocutaneous warning 93%
- Visual body form and orientation cues do not modulate visuo-tactile temporal integration 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.