Back

Image Analysis for Non-Neoplastic Kidney Disease: Utilizing Morphological Segmentation to Improve Quantification of Interstitial Fibrosis

Mola, N.; Maya Barbosa Silva, M.; Leh, S.; Weishaupt, H.

2025-11-11 pathology
10.1101/2025.11.10.686700 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Interstitial fibrosis (IF) is a hallmark of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and a strong predictor of progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Current biopsy-based IF assessments rely on subjective visual estimations, limiting reproducibility. Sirius Red staining is widely used for visualizing fibrotic tissue, yet its application in digital pathology is limited by non-specific staining. This study investigates the impact of cortical structure segmentation on fibrosis quantification in Sirius Red-stained, non-neoplastic kidney biopsies. Fibrosis measurements before and after segmentation were compared using two image analysis methods (stain deconvolution and red-green), with ground truth fibrosis measured by point counting and expert pathologist grading. Excluding non-interstitial structures led to a significant reduction of quantified fibrosis and improved correlation with pathology grading and point counting for both the stain deconvolution and the red green method. Bland-Altman analysis showed reduced bias after segmentation: for the deconvolution method, mean difference decreased from +2.5% (95% LoA: -8% to +13%) to +1% (-7% to +9%); for the red-green method, from +3% (-10% to +16%) to +1% (-8% to +10%). Correlation with pathology grading also improved (Spearmans {rho} rose from 0.55 to 0.58 for deconvolution and from 0.53 to 0.59 for red-green). These findings confirm that targeted segmentation enhances the accuracy and consistency of automated fibrosis assessment, supporting its integration into digital pathology workflows as a critical step toward reliable quantification of fibrosis in kidney disease.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.