Time- and frequency-resolved decomposition of beta brain activity reveals two functionally distinct beta bands
Korkealaakso, S.; Ahdends, C.; Niemela, L.; Vidaurre, D.; Renvall, H.; Pauls, A.
Show abstract
Oscillatory brain activity in the beta (13-30 Hz) range plays a central role in sensorimotor and other healthy brain processes and is a potential disease biomarker. However, even in the well-studied sensorimotor system, inconsistencies remain concerning betas differential role in maintaining and terminating movement. Emerging evidence suggests that beta comprises two frequency ranges, a lower (<20 Hz) and a higher (>20 Hz) subrange. Moreover, beta occurs in transient events which correlate with perception and action. We here use human whole-brain magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings and a Hidden Markov Model based analysis approach to discover whole-brain beta-band activity during rest and a naturalistic motor task in a data-driven manner. We successfully delineate two anatomically and functionally distinct beta band components which coexist throughout the neocortex. Low-beta (<20 Hz) events are very rare, high amplitude events, whereas high-beta (>20 Hz) is common but lower in amplitude. Both bands show state-specific anatomical distribution and modulation during a motor task: Low-beta is entirely absent during movement, whereas high-beta is only partially suppressed and reoccurs during postural maintenance. During post-movement beta rebound, low-beta event probability increases threefold, accompanied by strong low-beta event synchronization. A third state, probably corresponding to gamma activity, is active during task execution. Beta rebound occurs via a directed, sequential shift from gamma/active state via high-beta state to low-beta state. Our results provide strong experimental evidence for the coexistence of two functionally and anatomically distinct beta bands, and provide insights into their role in movement initiation, maintenance, and termination. Short abstractThe brains beta band activity is modulated by sensorimotor processing, but inconsistencies remain concerning betas role in maintaining and terminating movement. Mounting evidence points towards two beta bands with distinct functional roles. We use human whole-brain magnetoencephalography and a data-driven Hidden Markov Model based analysis approach to detect whole-brain beta-band activity. We delineate two anatomically and functionally distinct beta band states: a rarely occurring low-beta (<20 Hz) and a common high-beta (>20 Hz) state. During movement, low-beta is completely absent, whereas high-beta is only partially suppressed. During post-movement beta rebound, only low-beta increases significantly, accompanied by pronounced low-beta synchronization. Activity in gamma state increases during movement. Beta rebound occurs via a sequential shift from gamma via high-beta to low-beta state. Our results provide strong experimental evidence for the coexistence of two functionally and anatomically distinct beta bands and provide insights into their role in movement initiation, maintenance and termination.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Rhythmic interactions between the mediodorsal thalamus and prefrontal cortex precede human visual perception 97%
- Spatiotemporal brain hierarchies of auditory memory recognition and predictive coding 96%
- Spike-phase coupling of subthalamic neurons to posterior opercular cortex predicts speech sound accuracy 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Coupling of pupil- and neuronal population dynamics reveals diverse influences of arousal on cortical processing 96%
- Non-feature-specific elevated responses and feature-specific backward replay in human brain induced by visual sequence exposure 95%
- The neurodevelopmental trajectory of beta band oscillations: an OPM-MEG study 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.