Back

Evaluation of gene expression profiling beyond Breslow thickness and ulceration for prediction of distant metastases in early-stage melanoma: the population-based Dutch Early-Stage Melanoma (D-ESMEL) study

Zhou, C.; Chen, Y.-T.; Mooyaart, A.; Valent, E.; Pozza, L.; Huigh, D.; Nijsten, T.; Hollestein, L.

2025-11-13 oncology
10.1101/2025.11.10.25339906 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeDespite their central role in the current staging system, Breslow thickness and ulceration do not fully identify early-stage melanoma patients who will develop distant metastases. We assessed whether gene expression profiling (GEP) improves prediction of distant metastases beyond standard staging factors in early-stage melanoma. MethodsData were derived from the population-based Dutch Early-Stage Melanoma (D-ESMEL) study, including a matched discovery set of 442 stage I/II melanomas (221 case-control pairs) and a validation cohort of 308 melanomas nested within 5,815 patients. The discovery set was used to identify genes associated with distant metastases, independent of age, sex, Breslow thickness, and ulceration. The validation cohort was partitioned into model development and independent validation subsets. Candidate genes from the discovery set were used to develop and validate a GEP model, evaluated by weighted area under the curve (AUC) and concordance index (C-index). ResultsRNA sequencing succeeded for 356 melanomas in the discovery set, 200 in the model development subset, and 94 melanomas in the independent validation subset. Differential gene expression analyses and modeling identified 558 candidate genes. In the independent validation subset, the GEP model achieved a weighted AUC of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.66-0.86) and weighted C-index of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.69-0.88), comparable to the clinical model based on Breslow thickness and ulceration (weighted AUC 0.82 (95% CI, 0.73-0.90), weighted C-index 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76-0.91)). Integration of GEP with the clinical model did not improve accuracy. Gene set enrichment analyses showed enrichment of proliferative and stress-related pathways. ConclusionWhile GEP captured biologically relevant signals, its predictive accuracy for distant metastases was comparable to that of Breslow thickness and ulceration in a population-based early-stage melanoma cohort.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.7%
2
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.3%
4
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
5
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
7
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.1%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.3%
11
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
15
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
17
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
18
OncoImmunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
19
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
21
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
23
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Experimental Eye Research
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
27
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
28
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
29
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%