Back

Evaluation of gene expression profiling beyond Breslow thickness and ulceration for prediction of distant metastases in early-stage melanoma: the population-based Dutch Early-Stage Melanoma (D-ESMEL) study

Zhou, C.; Chen, Y.-T.; Mooyaart, A.; Valent, E.; Pozza, L.; Huigh, D.; Nijsten, T.; Hollestein, L.

2025-11-13 oncology
10.1101/2025.11.10.25339906 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeDespite their central role in the current staging system, Breslow thickness and ulceration do not fully identify early-stage melanoma patients who will develop distant metastases. We assessed whether gene expression profiling (GEP) improves prediction of distant metastases beyond standard staging factors in early-stage melanoma. MethodsData were derived from the population-based Dutch Early-Stage Melanoma (D-ESMEL) study, including a matched discovery set of 442 stage I/II melanomas (221 case-control pairs) and a validation cohort of 308 melanomas nested within 5,815 patients. The discovery set was used to identify genes associated with distant metastases, independent of age, sex, Breslow thickness, and ulceration. The validation cohort was partitioned into model development and independent validation subsets. Candidate genes from the discovery set were used to develop and validate a GEP model, evaluated by weighted area under the curve (AUC) and concordance index (C-index). ResultsRNA sequencing succeeded for 356 melanomas in the discovery set, 200 in the model development subset, and 94 melanomas in the independent validation subset. Differential gene expression analyses and modeling identified 558 candidate genes. In the independent validation subset, the GEP model achieved a weighted AUC of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.66-0.86) and weighted C-index of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.69-0.88), comparable to the clinical model based on Breslow thickness and ulceration (weighted AUC 0.82 (95% CI, 0.73-0.90), weighted C-index 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76-0.91)). Integration of GEP with the clinical model did not improve accuracy. Gene set enrichment analyses showed enrichment of proliferative and stress-related pathways. ConclusionWhile GEP captured biologically relevant signals, its predictive accuracy for distant metastases was comparable to that of Breslow thickness and ulceration in a population-based early-stage melanoma cohort.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.9%
2
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
3
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.7%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.7%
6
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
7
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
8
British Journal of Dermatology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
10
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.6%
12
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.1%
13
Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
16
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
17
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.3%
18
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
OncoImmunology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
21
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
24
Experimental Dermatology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
25
npj Genomic Medicine
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Metabolites
53 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
28
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
29
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
30
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%