Back

Genome-Wide Meta-Analysis Identifies 47 Novel Loci and Links Essential Tremor to Ventral Diencephalon and Cerebellum Morphometry

Ogonowski, N. S.; Cao, F.; Flores-Ocampo, V.; Salazar-Magana, S.; Seviiri, M.; Song, L.; Nayler, S.; Kugelman, J.; Cuellar-Partida, G.; MacGregor, S.; Im, H. K.; Harding, I. H.; Gharahkhani, P.; Martin, N. G.; Kumar, K. R.; Yang, J.; Diaz-Torres, S.; Renteria, M. E.

2025-11-11 neurology
10.1101/2025.11.10.25339873 medRxiv
Show abstract

Essential tremor (ET) is the most common movement disorder, yet its genetic basis remains poorly understood. We performed a genome-wide association meta-analysis including 20,268 ET cases and 723,761 neurologically healthy controls of European ancestry from the Million Veteran Program, 23andMe Research Institute and All of Us. We identified 50 independent genome-wide significant loci, including 47 novel loci. We estimated the SNP-based heritability to be 24%. Genetic correlation analyses revealed considerable overlap between ET and Parkinsons disease, myoclonus, and systemic traits such as cardiovascular and metabolic conditions. Inverse correlations were observed with cerebellar and diencephalic volumes. Integrative analyses prioritised candidate genes through transcriptome-wide association studies across 13 brain tissues, and spatial transcriptomics highlighted enrichment of ET heritability in hippocampal and cortical excitatory neurons as well as astrocytes and microglia. Polygenic risk scores significantly predicted ET risk and age at diagnosis across European and non-European cohorts, with the strongest transferability to admixed American ancestry. These findings substantially expand the catalogue of ET risk loci, implicate excitatory neurons and cerebellar-hippocampal circuit mechanisms, and provide a foundation for biomarker discovery and therapeutic development.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.