Back

Satisfaction and willingness-to-pay for water services in rural northern Ghana: Do we need intermediary steps toward safely managed services?

Trimmer, J.; Kisiangani, J.; Ewoenam Odame-Boafo, B.; Appavou, L.; Poulin, C.; Osei, D.; Delaire, C.; Bauza, V.

2025-11-13 public and global health
10.1101/2025.11.10.25339759 medRxiv
Show abstract

Universal access to safely managed water, defined as water from an improved source that is accessible on premises, available when needed, and free from contamination, remains far off in many low-resource settings. Progress toward safely managed services may include intermediate steps focused on improving some service attributes over others. However, knowledge surrounding households service preferences remains limited. This study explored satisfaction with existing water service characteristics and willingness-to-pay for hypothetical improvements in water supply. We conducted surveys with 1,748 households among 120 rural communities in northern Ghana. While few households (<2%) had safely managed water services, approximately half (52%) had at least basic access (i.e., an improved source where collection time is within 30 minutes). Satisfaction with existing water services was associated with source type, accessibility, availability, and perceived safety. For example, respondents who always had drinking water available in sufficient quantities had almost three times the odds of being satisfied (odds ratio [OR]: 2.66, 95% CI: 1.94-3.66), similar to respondents able to collect water within 30 minutes (OR: 3.09, 95% CI: 2.28-4.19) and those with on-premises water access (OR: 2.90, 95% CI: 1.26-6.66). Accessibility and water quality were particularly high priorities. Using discrete choice experiments, we estimated participants were willing to pay 3.6-4.9 times more for on-premises piped connections (compared with handpumps 30 minutes away) and chlorination (compared with no treatment). To a lesser extent, households were willing to pay for improved reliability, increased availability, and shorter collection times (10 vs. 30 minutes). Accordingly, we considered the possibility of introducing an intermediate service level: "proximate access", defined as using an improved source where water is collected within 10 minutes, available when needed, and (possibly) free from contamination. Such a category may provide feasible intermediate improvements to advance progress toward more highly valued safely managed services in rural, low-resource settings.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
26.0%
2
PLOS Water
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
12.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
8.5%
5
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.4%
6
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
7
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
9
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
10
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
11
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
12
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
15
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
17
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
19
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
23
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
24
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
25
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
26
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%