Back

A Study on the Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Profiles of the Novel PPAR Pan Agonist Chiglitazar Sodium in Rats with Hypoalbuminemia

Liu, X.; He, W.; Zhang, X.; Li, M.; Chen, B.; Tian, Y.; Sun, Q.; Zhao, X.; Zhao, Y.; Li, D.

2025-11-11 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2025.11.09.687466 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the changes in the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profiles of Chiglitazar Sodium between healthy rats and those with hypoalbuminemia, and to evaluate the medication safety of Chiglitazar in rats with hypoalbuminemia. MethodsLiquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was employed to determine the plasma concentration ofChiglitazar Sodium in both healthy rats and rats with hypoalbuminemia after administration. Pharmacokinetics were calculated based on the measured data. Blood glucose levels were monitored and recorded in both groups to observe pharmacodynamic changes. ResultsPharmacokinetic analysis revealed that, compared to the healthy group, only the Tmax in the hypoalbuminemia group was significantly earlier by 34.3% (P<0.001), while other pharmacokinetic parameters showed no significant differences. Pharmacodynamic studies indicated that blood glucose levels remained stable in both healthy rats and rats with hypoalbuminemia during the 0.25-10 hour monitoring period. ConclusionExcept for Tmax, there were no significant differences in PK/PD parameters between rats with hypoalbuminemia and healthy rats. Blood glucose levels remained stable in both groups after oral administration of Chiglitazar Sodium. The animal experimental results suggest that, under normal conditions, hypoalbuminemia does not affect the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of Chiglitazar Sodium.

Published in Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.