Back

Reading ability in both deaf and hearing adults is linked to neural representations of abstract phonology derived from visual speech

Evans, S.; Price, C. J.; Diedrichsen, J.; Twomey, T.; Beedie, I.; Fraser, M.; MacSweeney, M.

2025-11-10 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.11.09.684749 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Learning to read provides access to life-long educational and vocational opportunities. Some, but not all, deaf children find learning to read challenging, due to reduced access to language, whether spoken or signed. In hearing children, the ability to access and manipulate well-specified, abstract phonological representations of spoken language is important for developing strong reading skills. However, the role that phonology plays in deaf children learning to read is much less clear. Positive associations between speechreading (lip reading) and text reading have been observed in deaf and hearing children, and deaf adults, suggesting that speechreading may play a role in reading development, regardless of hearing status. Further support for this hypothesis would be provided by evidence that similar neural representations of phonology are evoked by visual speech and other language forms (auditory speech and text), and that these neural representations are related to reading proficiency. We used fMRI and Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) to identify shared neural representations of phonology. A group of deaf adult participants (N=22), with a mixture of sign language and spoken language backgrounds and reading abilities, were presented with single lexical items as visual speech and text. Adult hearing participants (N=25) were presented with the same words, but as visual speech and auditory speech. We hypothesised that common neural representations of phonological structure of English words would be found in each group in the superior and middle temporal cortex (STC/MTC) and that these shared representations would be more similar across different language forms in better readers. Our data supported these predictions providing neurobiological evidence of the contribution of visual speech to abstract phonological representations, that relate to reading proficiency, in both deaf and hearing adults.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
18.1%
2
Developmental Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.0%
4
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.1%
6
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.2%
8
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
9
Brain and Language
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
Neurobiology of Language
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
12
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
13
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
14
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
15
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
16
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.6%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.1%
19
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
23
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.6%
27
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.6%
29
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%