Back

Comparison of Bone Augmentation Techniques in the Mandibular Posterior Region: A Randomized Clinical Trial Protocol

Lanata-Flores, A.; Armijos Briones, M.; Benitez Sellan, P.; Ayala Aguirre, P. E.

2025-11-11 dentistry and oral medicine
10.1101/2025.11.09.25339853 medRxiv
Show abstract

This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial will compare the effectiveness of three bone-augmentation techniques applied to the posterior mandible using the cortical shell approach. Seventy-eight participants will be randomly allocated into three groups (autogenous, xenogeneic, or allogeneic cortical shells), each combined with a 1:1 mixture of autogenous bone chips and biomaterial. The study was approved by the CEISH-ITSUP Ethics Committee (Approval No. 1715824376) and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT06661447). Recruitment has not yet begun. The primary outcome will be horizontal bone gain (mm) evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) at 3, 6, and 12 months. Volumetric and morphometric analyses will be performed through a standardized digital workflow integrating intraoral scanning, CBCT segmentation, and surface registration. Secondary outcomes will include bone density, surgical duration, and postoperative inflammation. Based on previous CBCT-based randomized clinical trials, a total of 78 participants (26 per group) will provide 80-90% power to detect a 1.0 mm difference in horizontal bone gain among groups. This study aims to generate controlled, quantitative evidence on the volumetric and clinical performance of different cortical graft materials for posterior mandibular reconstruction.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.