Back

Stress granules and protein aggregates reveal intracellular resource competition

Buchholz, H. E.; Martin, S. A.; Dorweiler, J. E.; Prosser, D. C.; Sontag, E. M.; Manogaran, A. L.

2025-11-10 cell biology Community evaluation
10.1101/2025.11.08.687377 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Stress granules are biomolecular condensates that form in response to environmental stress and disassemble once normal conditions are restored. However, when disassembly fails, stress granules can persist and solidify. While stress granule solidification has been well documented, the cellular mechanisms underlying the transition from reversible to persistent stress granules remain unclear. Persistent stress granules can seed the formation of pathological aggregates, such as TDP-43 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis1, 2. Although amyloid and tau aggregates are hallmarks of Alzheimers disease, a subset of patients also develop TDP-43 deposits, suggesting a possible role for stress granule solidification in Alzheimers disease progression3-5. Despite theoretical models explaining why persistence and ensuing solidification occurs, strong in vivo evidence is lacking6. Here we show that competition for limited chaperone resources drive stress granule persistence. In the presence of TDP-43 aggregates or yeast amyloid proteins called prions, stress granule disassembly is slowed or halted disassembly. Using yeast prions as a model, we show that the addition of chaperones, specifically the AAA+ ATPase molecular chaperone, Hsp104, resulted in resumption of stress granule disassembly. Our results demonstrate that the competition for shared resources, such as molecular chaperones, can limit stress granule disassembly. We suspect that the presence of pathological aggregates results in resource competition within the aging brain, contributing to the persistence of stress granules and their subsequent solidification and aggregation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.