Back

Hidden Markov models detect recombination and ancestry of SARS-CoV-2

Masaki, N.; Bedford, T.

2026-01-08 genomics
10.1101/2025.11.08.687354 bioRxiv
Show abstract

When individuals are co-infected with distinct SARS-CoV-2 lineages, homologous recombination can generate mosaic genomes carrying mutations from both parental lineages. A variety of methods exist to detect recombinant sequences and their parental lineages in surveillance-scale datasets comprised of millions of SARS-CoV-2 genomes. However, these methods often rely on user-specified parameters, such as the probability a recombination breakpoint occurs between adjacent positions on the query sequence. In this study, we devise a hidden Markov model that detects recombinant SARS-CoV-2 sequences and identifies their parental lineages within a test set of sequences. Our method does not depend on user-specified parameters and can accommodate de novo mutations on the query sequence that are not present in the predicted parental lineages. To achieve this, we use maximum likelihood to estimate parameters that characterize the transition and emission probabilities in our hidden Markov model. Applying our method to 440,307 SARS-CoV-2 sequences sampled in England between September 2020 and March 2024, we detect 7,619 recombinant sequences corresponding to 1.73% (95% CI: [1.69%, 1.77%]) of all sampled sequences. We observe a positive association between the proportion of query sequences detected as recombinant in each week and community SARS-CoV-2 prevalence. This is consistent with higher prevalence increasing the risk of co-infection by distinct lineages and promoting the emergence of recombinant sequences. Finally, we observe localized clusters of recombination breakpoints within spike and in intergenic regions.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.