Back

Integrated Cross-Organ Transcriptomic Analysis Uncovers Conserved Gene Signatures Predictive of Allograft Rejection

Poorvi, H. C.; Vinod, P. K.

2025-11-09 systems biology
10.1101/2025.11.07.687316 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Long-term transplant success is limited by allograft rejection, a complex process traditionally studied on an organ-specific basis. To establish a unified framework beyond organ-specific studies, we performed a network-based systems biology analysis of transcriptomic data from 672 liver, kidney, and heart transplant biopsies to identify a conserved, pan-organ molecular framework of rejection. By constructing and comparing organ-specific gene co-expression networks, we identified a consensus, six-module immune cascade that captures the hierarchical nature of the alloimmune response. In addition, we also uncovered a highly conserved 24-gene cell cycle signature consistently upregulated in rejecting allografts, implicating cellular proliferation as a core feature of rejection pathology. From this framework, we derived a 172-gene immune signature and applied machine learning models to assess its predictive performance, achieving accuracy comparable to established benchmarks. We further refined this to a minimal, high-performance 20-gene immune signature (AUC > 0.96). Both the immune and cell cycle signatures demonstrated robust, pan-organ utility when independently validated in a lung transplant cohort (n=243). Collectively, these findings define a pan-organ molecular framework for rejection and highlight cell cycle dysregulation as a conserved hallmark, offering a foundation for standardized, cross-organ diagnostic platforms to improve allograft surveillance and patient outcomes.

Published in PLOS ONE (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.