Lower engagement of cognitive control, attention, modulation networks and lower creativity in children while using ChatGPT: an fMRI study
Horowitz-Kraus, T.; Kenett, Y. N.; Link, D.; Ashqar, E.; Farah, R.
Show abstract
Generative AI can scaffold idea generation, but how it engages control, attention, and memory systems in the developing versus mature brain, and how this relates to creativity, remains unclear. We compared 6-7-year-old (N = 15) children and adults (N = 16) during a naturalistic 5-minute co-creative dialogue with ChatGPT using the same prompt, in-scanner conversation, undergoing functional MRI scanning and their dialogues were recorded. Functional connectivity (Fishers z) was computed within and between seven large-scale networks: cingulo-opercular, default mode (DMN), memory retrieval, frontoparietal (FP), salience, ventral attention (VAN), and dorsal attention (DAN). Creativity scores, assessed outside of the scanner, did not differ between groups. Adults showed stronger within-network connectivity in control/attention systems, most robustly in FP, with additional effects in salience and DAN. Adults also exhibited greater cross-network integration, particularly FP-salience and FP-DAN couplings, alongside broader adult-greater effects among memory- and attention-related pairs. During a co-creative AI-assisted conversation, children exhibit a less coherent and integrated control-attention-memory architecture than adults. The combination of similar creativity scores with divergent neural profiles suggests that developmental differences in the implementation of creative cognition may be more pronounced than baseline capacity. Our findings highlight FP-centric pathways and their salience-gated interactions as candidate substrates by which creativity supports goal-directed co-creative dialogue with AI. HighlightsO_LIChildren demonstrate a lower within-network connectivity in the frontoparietal, salience, and dorsal attention systems while using ChatGPT compared to adults. C_LIO_LIReduced between-network integration in cognitive control and modulation networks (frontoparietal-salience and frontoparietal-dorsal) in children vs adults while using ChatGPT. C_LIO_LIIn adults, but not in children, higher creativity was associated with stronger connectivity within cognitive control networks. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Electrophysiological resting-state signatures link polygenic scores to general intelligence 96%
- No evidence for a relationship between social closeness and similarity in resting-state functional brain connectivity in schoolchildren 95%
- The neurocognitive gains of diagnostic reasoning training using simulated interactive veterinary cases. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Level Up the Brain! Novel PCA Method Reveals Key Neuroplastic Refinements in Action Video Gamers 95%
- Mapping brain function underlying naturalistic motor observation and imitation using high-density diffuse optical tomography 94%
- Zero-phase-delay synchrony between interacting neural populations: implications for functional connectivity derived biomarkers 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Amsterdam Open MRI Collection, a set ofmultimodal MRI datasets for individual differenceanalyses 95%
- A multimodal fMRI dataset unifying naturalistic processes with a rich array of experimental tasks 95%
- The Dual Mechanisms of Cognitive Control dataset, a theoretically-guided within-subject task fMRI battery 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinally stable, brain-based predictive models mediate the relationships between childhood cognition and socio-demographic, psychological and genetic factors 93%
- The cumulative impact of clinical risk on brain networks and associations with executive function impairments in adolescents with congenital heart disease 93%
- Reorganization of thalamocortical connections in congenitally blind humans 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.