The TEAIV model: Extending the standard TEIV model to account for viral budding ramp up
Gholami, S.; Korosec, C.; Su, Q.; Betti, M.; Conway, J. M.; Moyles, I.; Watmough, J.; Heffernan, J. M.
Show abstract
Understanding how viruses replicate and spread within a host is fundamental to predicting disease progression, timing, and dosage of effective therapeutic and prophylactic interventions. A target-cell limited approach is often used to model within-host viral kinetics to characterize disease infection dynamics. The standard target-cell limited model, the TEIV model, has been instrumental for understanding SARS-CoV-2 within-host viral kinetics, however, its core assumptions of instantaneous viral budding and exponentially distributed cell lifetimes oversimplify fundamental biological processes, potentially limiting predictive power. In this work, we consider a novel model approach, the TEAIV model: an extension to the TEIV model that considers an infected partially-productive cell state that ramps up through n stages to a fully productive state. We fit the TEAIV model to various SARS-CoV-2 viral load datasets, separated by hospitalized (severe infection) and non-hospitalized (mild infection) individual data, consider multiple different ramping functions, and compare to standard TEIV model fits. We further compare TEAIV and TEIV model fits with and without infected cell death incorporated in the eclipse (E) and partially infected (A) compartments and investigate best-fit frameworks up to 10 A states. We find that linear budding ramp-up dynamics minimizes the BIC (with {Delta}BIC > 2) across all model formulations when the total number of eclipse and budding compartments exceeds three. Furthermore, we find that the inclusion or exclusion of cell death applied to eclipse or ramping compartments does not substantially affect this result. Finally, we analytically consider the most general TEAIV model and discuss future modelling considerations. Our results demonstrate that accounting for non-instantaneous viral budding provides a better fit to SARS-CoV-2 viral load data and establishes a foundation for more mechanistically informed within-host models.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatially distributed infection increases viral load in a computational model of SARS-CoV-2 lung infection 96%
- A Modular Framework for Multiscale Spatial Modeling of Viral Infection and Immune Response in Epithelial Tissue 96%
- Modeling within-host and aerosol dynamics of SARS-CoV-2: the relationship with infectiousness 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Introducing a framework for within-host dynamics and mutations modelling of H5N1 influenza infection in humans 98%
- Will an outbreak exceed available resources for control? Estimating the risk from invading pathogens using practical definitions of a severe epidemic 96%
- Adaptive vaccination may be needed to eliminate COVID-19: Results from a runtime-alterable strain-drift and waning-immunity model 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 infection dynamics in Denmark, February through October 2020: Nature of the past epidemic and how it may develop in the future 95%
- Simple discrete-time self-exciting models can describe complex dynamic processes: a case study of COVID-19 95%
- Trajectories of COVID-19: a longitudinal analysis of many nations and subnational regions 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impacts of vaccination and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 variants Alpha and Delta on Coronavirus Disease 2019 transmission dynamics in four metropolitan areas of the United States 96%
- Modelling Immune Dynamics in Locally Advanced MSI-H/dMMR Colorectal Cancer with Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab Treatment: From Differential Equations to an Agent-Based Framework 95%
- Effect of human behavior on the evolution of viral strains during an epidemic 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.