Back

The TEAIV model: Extending the standard TEIV model to account for viral budding ramp up

Gholami, S.; Korosec, C.; Su, Q.; Betti, M.; Conway, J. M.; Moyles, I.; Watmough, J.; Heffernan, J. M.

2025-11-07 systems biology
10.1101/2025.11.07.687137 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding how viruses replicate and spread within a host is fundamental to predicting disease progression, timing, and dosage of effective therapeutic and prophylactic interventions. A target-cell limited approach is often used to model within-host viral kinetics to characterize disease infection dynamics. The standard target-cell limited model, the TEIV model, has been instrumental for understanding SARS-CoV-2 within-host viral kinetics, however, its core assumptions of instantaneous viral budding and exponentially distributed cell lifetimes oversimplify fundamental biological processes, potentially limiting predictive power. In this work, we consider a novel model approach, the TEAIV model: an extension to the TEIV model that considers an infected partially-productive cell state that ramps up through n stages to a fully productive state. We fit the TEAIV model to various SARS-CoV-2 viral load datasets, separated by hospitalized (severe infection) and non-hospitalized (mild infection) individual data, consider multiple different ramping functions, and compare to standard TEIV model fits. We further compare TEAIV and TEIV model fits with and without infected cell death incorporated in the eclipse (E) and partially infected (A) compartments and investigate best-fit frameworks up to 10 A states. We find that linear budding ramp-up dynamics minimizes the BIC (with {Delta}BIC > 2) across all model formulations when the total number of eclipse and budding compartments exceeds three. Furthermore, we find that the inclusion or exclusion of cell death applied to eclipse or ramping compartments does not substantially affect this result. Finally, we analytically consider the most general TEAIV model and discuss future modelling considerations. Our results demonstrate that accounting for non-instantaneous viral budding provides a better fit to SARS-CoV-2 viral load data and establishes a foundation for more mechanistically informed within-host models.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.