Back

Assessment of Visual Function in Mice Using Light/Dark Box and Multi-Feature Machine Learning

Wang, T.; Chang, K.; Tomasi, M.; Lee, C.-Y.; Chen, D. F.; Luo, G.

2026-02-26 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2025.11.07.687135 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The light/dark box test can be used to assess visual function in rodents based on their spontaneous behavior in response to light. Commonly used assay relies on a single behavioral metric, dwell time in the light or dark compartment, which may be influenced by factors other than vision, leading to unreliable assessment results. To overcome this, we developed a multi-feature machine learning paradigm by extracting multiple mouse behavioral metrics, standardizing them as features to train machine learning models, thereby achieving reliable and automated vision assessment. We systematically compared the classification performance of single-metric versus multi-feature machine learning approaches in sighted and blind mice, using wild-type and rhodopsin-deficient mice, with a subset further subjected to double optic nerve crush. We found that the multi-feature method can improve classification performance and exhibit great robustness to different experimental settings. Additionally, we further improved model performance by applying feature importance analysis and constructing an optimized feature subset. These findings suggest that the reliability of commonly used single dwell time measure for vision assessment could become unreliable, as shown in our experiment, probably because in addition to vision other factors also impact dwell time. Our study demonstrated an improved assessment method based on a combination of multiple behavior features through machine learning. Author SummaryAssessing visual function in mice is essential for studying eye diseases and drug development. The light/dark box test evaluates visual function by measuring the spontaneous behavioral response of mice to light, providing a training-free behavioral approach that helps simplify the assessment process and improve research efficiency. However, traditional light/dark box tests rely on a single behavioral metric, dwell time in the light or dark compartment, to assess visual function, which may be influenced by factors other than vision, such as anxiety and exploratory behavior, leading to limited reliability of assessment results. Here, we demonstrate that integrating multiple behavioral features through machine learning can improve the reliability and stability of vision assessment. By automatically tracking and analyzing various behavioral metrics of mice, such as movement patterns, speed, and spatial preferences, the proposed method can more reliably distinguish between sighted and blind mice. Furthermore, the method demonstrates stable performance across different experimental settings, showing good applicability. This automated, reliable, and easily generalizable method can provide a convenient and efficient means for visual assessment in preclinical research, facilitating vision disease research and drug development.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
23.3%
3
Behavior Research Methods
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
5
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.7%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.7%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
8
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
9
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
10
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
11
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
13
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
14
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
15
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
SoftwareX
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
17
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
18
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
22
Current Protocols
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
23
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
24
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%