Movement Effort does not alter the Planning Horizon of Sequential Reaching Movements
Bellmann, A.; Oostwoud Wijdenes, L.; Medendorp, W. P.
Show abstract
Everyday tasks often involve multiple reaching movements in a sequence, where the choices made for one movement also affect the conditions for subsequent movements. Previous research indicates that humans are capable of planning ahead to optimize such sequences. Here, we ask whether increasing the resistance to movement prompts participants to plan even further ahead to reduce overall movement effort. Participants (n=28) were shown 14 targets that varied in size, value and location, and were instructed to accumulate as many points as possible. To collect each target, they reached while holding the handle of a robotic manipandulum that applied a resistive force. We analyzed their target choices using a planning model that takes into account the size, value and distance of several future targets. We expected that, as resistance - and therefore the effort required to move between two targets - increased, participants would plan further ahead to minimize total movement distance. Results show that participants typically planned 2-4 targets ahead. However, increasing resistance did not significantly affect the planning horizon. We conclude that movement effort is not a primary constraint on the planning horizon in sequential reaching movements. NEW AND NOTEWORTHYHumans are capable of planning ahead in sequential reaching movements, but whether they adjust their planning horizon according to task demands is unknown. To manipulate task demands, we increased movement effort during a free target collection task. This makes planning more beneficial. However, we found no adjustment in planning horizon, suggesting that movement effort might not be a critical factor for planning in sequential reaching movements.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Online interference of declarative memory on fast and slow adaptive processes in force field motor learning 97%
- Sensitivity to Error During Visuomotor Adaptation is Similarly Modulated by Abrupt, Gradual and Random Perturbation Schedules 97%
- A control policy can be adapted to task demands during both motor execution and motor planning 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.