Impact of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) machinery on HIV-1 replication in primary CD4+ T cells
Jackson-Jones, K. A.; Simons, L. M.; Huang, S.; Joseph, T.; Sawyer, A.; Wu, L.; Hultquist, J. F.
Show abstract
N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most prevalent internal modification of cellular and viral RNA and is critical to the regulation of its localization, stability, and translation. Previous studies on the role of m6A during HIV-1 replication have produced conflicting results. Since m6A function can vary dramatically by cell type and state, here we aimed to clarify the role of the m6A machinery during HIV-1 replication in primary CD4+ T cells. Using CRISPR-Cas9 we targeted 46 cellular genes implicated in m6A or 5-methylcytosine (m5C) regulation and measured subsequent HIV-1 replication in primary CD4+ T cells. Only knockout of the m6A writer complex auxiliary proteins VIRMA and WTAP, and the m6A reader YTHDF2 were validated as significantly decreasing HIV-1 replication. In contrast, knockout of METTL3 or METTL14, which form the catalytic core of the writer complex, resulted in only marginal changes in HIV-1 infection, despite significant decreases in total cellular m6A levels. Chemical inhibition of METTL3 led to a dose-dependent decrease in HIV-1 infection, coupled with an increase in protein levels of METTL3 and other writer complex members. Expression of writer proteins was also co-dependent, revealing complex regulatory feedback mechanisms. Overall, these results clarify the role of epitranscriptomic machinery during HIV-1 replication in primary CD4+ T cells and suggest regulation by auxiliary members of the m6A writer complex is more influential than the function of the catalytic core itself on HIV-1 infection in primary CD4+ T cells. IMPORTANCEm6A is the most common chemical modification on cellular and viral RNA and regulates its stability, localization, and translation. m6A modification and its regulation varies dramatically between cell types and cell states. In this study, we investigated the role of m6A factors during HIV-1 infection of physiologically relevant primary CD4+ T cells. Using CRISPR-Cas9 to knockout 46 cellular genes implicated in RNA modification, we found only the m6A writer complex auxiliary members WTAP and VIRMA, and the reader YTHDF2, significantly affected HIV-1 replication in these cells. In contrast, knockout of METTL3 or METTL14, which form the catalytic core of the writer complex, resulted in marginal changes in HIV-1 infection, despite larger reductions in total cellular m6A levels. Our findings suggest regulation by auxiliary members of the m6A writer complex is more influential than the function of the catalytic core itself on HIV-1 infection in primary CD4+ T cells.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Release of P-TEFb from the Super Elongation Complex promotes HIV-1 latency reversal 98%
- HIV-1 accessory protein Vpr possesses a cryptic p300-dependent transcription-promoting activity that is blocked by histone deacetylases in CD4+ T cells. 98%
- A targeted CRISPR screen identifies ETS1 as a regulator of HIV latency. 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Th17 cell master transcription factor RORC2 regulates HIV-1 gene expression and viral outgrowth 97%
- IFN-inducible Human Phospholipid Scramblase 1 (PLSCR1) ProteinRestricts HIV-1 Infection by Inhibiting Membrane Fusion 96%
- Longitudinal clonal dynamics of HIV-1 latent reservoirs measured by combination quadruplex polymerase chain reaction and sequencing 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Human immunodeficiency virus-1 induces host genomic R-loop and preferentially integrates its genome near the R-loop regions 97%
- Hydrogen sulfide blocks HIV rebound by maintaining mitochondrial bioenergetics and redox homeostasis 97%
- Antagonism of PP2A is an independent and conserved function of HIV-1 Vif and causes cell cycle arrest 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.