Back

Offline Reconstruction of Diffusion MRI Acquisitions for Comparison Between Complex PCA-based and AI-based Denoising

D'Antonio, F.; Warrington, S.; Manzano-Patron, J.-P.; Morgan, P. S.; Sotiropoulos, S. N.

2025-11-07 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.11.07.682283 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeOptimal diffusion MRI (dMRI) data for image denoising is often unavailable from scanner reconstruction. In this work, we make available an offline reconstruction pipeline for GE dMRI acquisitions, giving access to complex dMRI data. Furthermore, we compare the efficacy of GE HealthCares AIR-Recon DL (ARDL), a proprietary convolutional neural network-based reconstruction and denoising approach, to open-source PCA-based MPPCASVS and NORDIC denoising methods on high-resolution dMRI data. MethodsWe developed an end-to-end offline dMRI reconstruction pipeline for GE HealthCare acquisitions, augmenting the Orchestra software development kit, and validated its output against scanner reconstruction. We used it to compare MPPCASVS, NORDIC and ARDL denoising approaches, considering underlying metrics reflecting noise variance and bias, such as the ADC profiles in highly anisotropic areas, and downstream measurements, such as fiber orientation estimation and white matter tractography. ResultsOur validated offline reconstruction supports various in-plane/out-of-plane accelerations and partial Fourier reconstruction methods. Unlike scanner reconstruction, it provides access to complex dMRI data, enabling denoising in the complex domain, which demonstrated superior noise floor suppression compared to magnitude-constrained denoising. PCA-based denoising methods had improved spatial resolution, contrast-to-noise and more robust fiber orientation estimation compared to ARDL. ConclusionWe found significant gains in dMRI data quality when using the proposed offline reconstruction pipeline, allowing complex-domain denoising to obtain high-quality data at high spatial resolution and b-value, using a wide-bore scanner and a standard PGSE EPI sequence. MPPCASVS and NORDIC (4D PCA-based) outperformed ARDL (2D) in terms of spatial resolution, reduction of noise-floor bias and variance.

Published in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.