Back

Sample-multiplexed FACS-preprocessing of PBMCs enables scalable scRNA-seq without compromising transcriptomic or cellular integrity

Mokhtari, M.; Ramnarine, T. J. S.; Eicher, A.; Braunsperger, A.; Baumert, P.; Wolf, C.; Durmaz, G.; Pfaffenstaller, V.; Kendirli, A.; Kerschensteiner, M.; Schoenfelder, M.; Lee-Kirsch, M. A.; Wackerhage, H.; Mages, S. W.; Klughammer, J.

2025-11-07 genomics
10.1101/2025.11.06.687014 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Efficient preprocessing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) for single-cell RNA-Sequencing (scRNA-seq) is crucial to ensure high sample throughput while maintaining sample integrity. In particular, when enrichment of rare immune cell populations is necessary to enable their representative profiling among more common PBMCs, sample preprocessing may become a detrimental bottleneck. Here, we present an optimized fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-based preprocessing workflow designed to enrich rare immune cells while conserving overall PBMC composition. The protocol integrates dead cell removal, targeted rare cell enrichment, channel splitting, and hash-based sample multiplexing together with a new powerful yet lightweight demultiplexing tool (YAHD), improving throughput and cell yield, reducing batch effects, and preserving biological context. Validation across cryopreserved human PBMCs obtained from different scientifically relevant sources (clinical routine and laboratory setting) demonstrated improved sample viability and representation of rare subsets in the final scRNA-seq data. Thorough transcriptomic assessment confirmed non-concerning levels of stress induction and T cell activation as well as low technical variability, removing concerns around FACS-processing, cross-donor multiplexing and channel splitting. The presented approach enables scalable and biologically faithful PBMC preprocessing for scRNA-seq, advancing the study of immune heterogeneity in health and disease.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.