Back

Phylogenomics supports monophyly of marsupial crustaceans: a journey to direct development

Barta, A.-C.; Grams, M.; Bracken-Grissom, H.; Brix, S.; Cordeiro, L. M.; Cummings, B.; Collins, S.; Farris, W. J.; Gerken, S.; Höpel, C. G.; Lörz, A.-N.; McKim, S.; Meland, K.; Kruckenhauser, L.; Olesen, J.; Peres, P. A.; Richter, S.; Wetzer, R.; Williams, J.; Kocot, K. M.; Schwentner, M.

2025-11-07 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.11.06.686749 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Peracarida (marsupial crustaceans) represent one of the most diverse and ecologically important crustacean groups, yet their evolutionary relationships have long been debated. Here, we present the most comprehensive phylogenomic analysis of Peracarida to date, incorporating the relict taxa Thermosbaenacea, Mictacea, Ingolfiellida, and Spelaeogriphacea for the first time in a phylogenomic framework. Our results robustly confirm peracarid monophyly and recover a well-supported clade uniting Mancoida (Isopoda, Tanaidaca, Cumacea), Mictacea, and Spelaeogriphacea. We propose the new taxon Panmancoida to encompass this expanded lineage defined by shared developmental and morphological traits. The inferred phylogeny further suggests that peracarid evolution involved a transition from an intermediate "pseudodirect" developmental mode to the direct development seen in most lineages. We further show that the shift to extensive brood care within the marsupium, accompanied by the loss of a free-swimming larval stage, may have accelerated rates of molecular evolution across lineages. Together, these findings provide a robust evolutionary framework for this major malacostracan lineage and highlight how key reproductive innovations reshaped the genomic and life-history trajectories of the marsupial crustaceans.

Published in Molecular Biology and Evolution (predicted rank #6) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.