Back

Deep leaning auto-segmentation of tomographic datasets, repeatability and biomechanical outcomes

Bowers, F. C.; Lane, R.; Kawafi, W.; Rayfield, E.; Paul, D.; Pollock, T.; Berks, H.; Hammond, C. L.

2026-01-13 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.11.06.686240 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Automated segmentation of three-dimensional micro-computed tomography (CT) scan data is a critical bottleneck in computational morphometrics and biomechanical modelling across musculoskeletal biology. Although advances in imaging have generated increasingly large and complex datasets, manual segmentation remains prohibitively time-consuming, while existing deep learning solutions are often application-specific and rarely validated for their impact on downstream analyses. Here we present a generalisable computational framework for automated segmentation and biomechanical validation of skeletal structures, implemented using an attention-augmented 3D U-Net architecture. Using the adult zebrafish (Danio rerio) mandible as a representative case study, the network was trained on 47 manually segmented specimens and evaluated using a combined Dice-Hausdorff metric that integrates both volumetric and surface accuracy to capture biologically relevant morphology better than Dice score alone. To assess performance in a downstream biomechanical context, we directly compared automated segmentations with those produced by three expert human annotators and constructed finite element models from each. Quantitative comparisons of segmentation accuracy and statistical analyses of finite element outputs demonstrate that automated segmentations perform within the range of expert human annotations, with no systematic bias in mechanical predictions. By explicitly linking geometric accuracy to biomechanical outcomes, this work establishes an end-to-end pipeline for validating automated segmentation in computational biology. The framework will be applicable to a wide range of musculoskeletal and palaeobiological contexts, including comparative anatomy, ageing and disease studies, and fossil or incomplete specimens, where scalable and mechanically faithful segmentation is essential. Author summaryMany studies now use CT scanning to build computer models of bones and test how they perform under load. However, these analyses usually start with manual segmentation, where an expert traces the bone in thousands of image slices to create a 3D surface. This step is time-consuming and introduces uncertainty because experts do not always agree exactly on where boundaries lie. If segmentation changes the model shape, it may also change predicted biomechanics. In this work, we test whether deep learning can automate segmentation while preserving biomechanical outcomes. We train an attention augmented 3D U-Net to segment the adult zebrafish lower jaw and compare its outputs directly to three expert manual segmentations. We assess similarity using complementary measures that reflect both overall overlap and boundary differences. We then build finite element models from each segmentation and compare predicted stress, strain, and displacement distributions. We show that automated segmentations are as consistent as human experts and generate indistinguishable biomechanical predictions, without systematic bias. This supports scalable, repeatable pipelines for linking anatomy to function, and provides a general approach for validating automated segmentation in studies where downstream modelling is the goal.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.