Back

A Quantitative Review of Biodiversity Trends during the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event

Richards, J.; Nanglu, K.; Ortega-Hernandez, J.

2025-11-06 paleontology
10.1101/2025.11.05.686803 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event (GOBE) embodies the most dramatic increase of marine biodiversity and escalation of macroecological complexity during the early Phanerozoic. Despite its critical role, the precise timing and duration of the GOBE remain controversial. Numerous palaeobiological studies have attempted to quantify the GOBE based on estimates of species richness through time for various groups of marine organisms. However, these studies use fossil data restricted to specific geographic regions or employ disparate methodologies that preclude direct analytical comparisons. We present a meta-analysis of Ordovician biodiversity that integrates information from multiple temporal, geographic, and ecological scales. We collate 98 datasets from 54 publications to analyze temporally standardized rates of marine species biodiversity accumulation between the latest Cambrian and throughout the entire Ordovician using an effect-size approach. Our results indicate statistically significant high rates of sustained species accumulation that can be traced from the late Cambrian and until the Middle Ordovician, stabilization during the Late Ordovician and then a precipitous decline caused by the Late Ordovician Mass Extinction. Geographic scale (global vs regional) has no significant bearing on rates of biodiversification, with the only exception observed during the Dapingian-Darriwilian transition, supporting the hypothesis of mass dispersal of generalists during the Early Ordovician. Benthic and suspension-feeding organisms show high rates of biodiversity accumulation throughout most of the Ordovician (Tremadocian-Sandbian), whereas the diversification of nektonic, pelagic and predatory/scavenger organisms was mostly restricted to the Early Ordovician.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.5%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
5
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.0%
6
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.1%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.3%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.2%
9
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
10
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
14
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
16
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
17
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
18
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
20
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
22
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%