Resolving Heterogeneity in Major Depression: Overcoupling and Undercoupling Subtypes Exhibit Differential Treatment Response and Molecular Pathways
Gao, H.; Ma, Y.; Qian, R.; Jin, T.; Gu, B.; Qiu, B.; Ye, S.; Huang, M.; Wu, D.; zhao, z.
Show abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) exhibits significant heterogeneity whose neurobiological mechanisms remain elusive. Alterations in morphological-functional coupling (MFC) have been observed in MDD. This study aims to investigate MDD subtypes based on MFC alterations and their associations with clinical symptoms and molecular basis. We identified two clinically distinct MDD subtypes in multi-center neuroimaging data (Discovery: 828 MDD/776 healthy controls; Validation: 236 MDD/86 healthy controls) by using a semi-supervised machine learning approach based on MFC changes, which were validated and robustly repeated in the validation dataset. Differences among subtypes were then examined in relation to clinical assessments, gene expression patterns, neurotransmitter and cell density, and treatment response. Subtype I (overcoupling) showed elevated MFC in high-order association cortices, linking to synaptic transmission activity and severe symptoms. Subtype II (undercoupling) demonstrated reduced MFC in primary cortices, associated with cell cycle regulation and treatment resistance. Both subtypes shared molecular signatures (cell types: astrocytes and oligodendrocytes; neurotransmitter systems: serotonergic and GABAergic receptors). Crucially, longitudinal data (33 MDD undergoing Escitalopram monotherapy) revealed that undercoupling subtype exhibited better response, implying a potential mechanism of the drug via increasing the MFC. Our work deciphers MFC-driven MDD phenotypes with distinct molecular profiles and differential treatment outcomes, suggesting potential pathways for personalized diagnosis and treatment strategies in MDD, advancing precision psychiatry.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Heterogeneity in Depression: evidence for distinct clinical and neurobiological profiles 96%
- Dimensional and Categorical Solutions to Parsing Depression Heterogeneity in a Large Single-Site Sample 96%
- Predictive Patterns of Antidepressant Response from Pre-Treatment Reward Processing using Functional MRI and Deep Learning: Key Results from the EMBARC Randomized Clinical Trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Maladaptive avoidance learning in the orbitofrontal cortex in adolescents with major depression 95%
- Machine learning identifies large-scale reward-related activity modulated by dopaminergic enhancement in major depression 95%
- Neuroinflammation in the amygdala is associated with recent depressive symptoms 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Meta-analysis of Reward Processing in Major Depressive Disorder Reveals Distinct Abnormalities within the Reward Circuit 96%
- Differential and spatial expression meta-analysis of genes identified in genome-wide association studies of depression 95%
- Extracellular Matrix Abnormalities in the Hippocampus of Subjects with Substance Use Disorder 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Structural brain alterations associated with suicidal thoughts and behaviors in young people: results across 21 international studies from the ENIGMA Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviours consortium 94%
- A brain-enriched circRNA blood biomarker can predict response to SSRI antidepressants 94%
- Connectome architecture shapes large-scale cortical alterations in schizophrenia: a worldwide ENIGMA study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.