The individual brain: mapping variability in hemispheric functional organization across cognitive domains in a representative sample
Karlsson, E. M.; Gerrits, R.; Vingerhoets, G.
Show abstract
Several core cognitive networks in the human brain show marked left-right differences in their functional organization. While these asymmetries are well described at the level of individual functions, overarching patterns of variability in hemispheric functional organization across multiple domains have not been mapped in a representative sample. To address this gap, we conducted a large-scale neuroimaging study with 200 participants (100 left-handers and 100 right-handers) to map hemispheric phenotypes across four distinct cognitive domains: language, tool use, spatial attention, and face perception. We challenge the traditional one-size-fits-all view of hemispheric organization by showing that deviations from the typical pattern of functional segregation are more prevalent than generally assumed, in both left- and right-handers. As predicted, variation in asymmetry was more pronounced in the left-handed sample. Critically, we found no evidence that the prototypical, "textbook", pattern of brain organization confers any advantage in general cognitive ability or IQ. These results challenge the assumption of a single optimal brain organization and demonstrate that hemispheric functional segregation in humans is much more variable than anticipated.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Functional specialization of the medial temporal lobes in human recognition memory: dissociating effects of hippocampal vs parahippocampal damage. 95%
- Reorganization of the neurobiology of language after sentence overlearning 94%
- Motor planning modulates neural activity patterns in early human auditory cortex 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.