Back

Nutrient fluctuation alters effects of litter diversity of invasive species on native communities

Wang, X.; Van Kleunen, M.; Zheng, W.-L.; Han, J.-J.; Wu, C.-L.; Yang, S.; Yu, F.-H.

2025-11-06 ecology
10.1101/2025.11.05.686688 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Invasive alien plants can indirectly suppress native plants by altering soil biota and nutrient cycling through their litter input. The diversity of litter resulting from co-invasion by multiple species may further modulate these impacts. Fluctuating resources are known to favour many invasive plants; however, it is unclear how nutrient fluctuations alter the effects of litter diversity of invasive plants on native communities. Therefore, we grew a native plant community in a control soil without litter, as well as in soils mixed with litter from one, two, three, and six invasive species under constant or pulsed nutrient supply. Invasive species litter altered soil microbial communities, and increased soil total nitrogen concentration and native community biomass. Under pulsed nutrient supply, native community biomass and soil total phosphorus concentration decreased with increasing litter diversity of the invasive species. However, these effects did not occur under constant nutrient supply. A structural equation model indicated that soil phosphorus and fungal community composition were key mediating factors driving the decrease in native community biomass with increasing litter diversity under pulsed nutrient supply. Our findings underscore that the impact of alien invaders on native communities depends on the diversity of the alien plant litter and nutrient fluctuations. HighlightUnder pulsed nutrient supply, increasing invasive species litter diversity reduced native community biomass, mediated primarily by shifts in soil phosphorus and fungal community composition. These effects were absent under constant nutrient conditions.

Published in Oecologia · training set

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.