National Trends and Geographic Disparities in Ischemic Heart Disease Mortality in the United States, 1968-2023
umar, M.; Kritika, F.; Jairamani, S.; Rathi, D.; Baig, M. M. A.; Chauhan, A.; Yang, E.; Guha, A.; Kunhiraman, H. H.; Rana, J. S.; Alhassan, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundIschemic heart disease (IHD) is a leading cause of mortality in the United States, with significant variations across demographic and geographic factors. This study analyzes trends in IHD-related mortality among adults (> 25 years) from 1968 to 2023 using the CDC WONDER database. MethodsWe analyzed death certificates of adults aged >25 years from the CDC-WONDER database with IHD (ICD-8 codes: 410-413, ICD-9 codes: 410-414 and ICD-10 codes: I20-I25) from 1968-2023. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) per 100,000 population were stratified by gender, race, census region, and year. Join-Point analysis was performed to estimate annual percent change (APC) and average annual percent change (AAPC), complemented by spatiotemporal modeling to capture the geographic variations and evolving patterns of IHD mortality over time. ResultsBetween 1968 and 2023, IHD caused 27,685,173 deaths in adults aged >25 years. Throughout the study period, the overall AAMR demonstrated a sustained and significant decline, falling from 746.29 in 1968 to 127.07 in 2023 with an AAPC (-3.12; 95% CI: -3.51 to -2.73; p<0.001). Additionally, the overall AAMR for males (452.99) was higher than that of females (260.08). Non-Hispanic (NH) Black or African American displayed slightly higher AAMR (346.75) as compared to NH white (345.38). The Northeast had the highest overall AAMR (379.61), followed by the Midwest (351.31), the South (329.15), and the West (303.15). Older adults ([≥]65 years) had the highest overall crude mortality rate (CMR) (1312.66), followed by middle-aged adults (45-64 years) (171.67). Younger adults (25-44 years) had the lowest rate (12.18). ConclusionMortality rates due to IHD have decreased in the United States over the last few decades. However, the rate of decline has decreased in the past decade. In addition, significant disparities still exist across different sexes, age, race/ethnicity, and geographic regions. These disparities highlight the need for targeted interventions and improvement of clinical care facilities in high-risk populations.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on US Mortality: A County-Level Analysis 93%
- Sociodemographic Characteristics and Longitudinal Progression of Multimorbidity: A Multistate Modelling Analysis of a Large Primary Care Records Dataset in England 93%
- Differential impact of Covid-19 on incidence of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases in acute, post-acute and long Covid-19: population-based cohort study in the United Kingdom 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal associations of sustained low or high income and income variability with incident cardiovascular disease in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective population-based cohort study 93%
- Clinical presentation, disease course and outcome of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with and without pre-existing cardiac disease – a cohort study across sixteen countries 92%
- Mortality Risk and Treatment Disparities in the Chinese SMuRF-less STEMI Patients: A Nationwide Cohort Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 Mortality in California Based on Death Certificates: Disproportionate Impacts Across Racial/Ethnic Groups and Nativity 95%
- Racial/Ethnic Disparities in the Observed COVID-19 Case Fatality Rate Among the U.S. Population 92%
- School Neighborhood Deprivation is Associated with a Higher Prevalence of Hypertension 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factors for severe COVID-19 differ by age: a retrospective study of hospitalized adults 92%
- Comparison of COVID-19 outcomes among shielded and non-shielded populations: A general population cohort study of 1.3 million 92%
- Ethnic disparities in hospitalisation and hospital-outcomes during the second wave of COVID-19 infection in east London 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.