Back

The Clinical-Functional Vulnerability Index-20 (IVCF-20) Predicts Adverse Outcomes in Older Adults Admitted through the Emergency Department

Pinheiro, T. C. E.; Angelo, M. A. F.; Aliberti, M. J. R.; Machado, C. J.; Goncalves, V. E.; Ramos, N. E.; Alcantara, C. O.; Pereira, F. M.; Peixoto, A. P. A. F.; Machado, F. S.; Viana, B. M.; Moraes, E. N.; Bicalho, M. A. C.

2025-11-06 geriatric medicine
10.1101/2025.11.05.25339627 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundFrailty assessment in the Emergency Department (ED) is essential for identifying older adults at risk of adverse outcomes. The 20-item Clinical-Functional Vulnerability Index (IVCF-20) is a rapid, multidimensional screening tool widely used in Brazilian primary care, but its predictive validity in the ED has not been established. We aimed to evaluate the ability of the IVCF-20 to predict 180-day mortality and other adverse outcomes in older adults admitted to a public ED. MethodsObservational cohort study comprising patients aged [≥]60 years consecutively admitted through the ED of a University Hospital in Brazil. Baseline frailty was assessed with the IVCF-20 and categorized as robust (0-6), pre-frail (7-14), mild-to-moderate (15-29), and severe frail (30-40). The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), a validated frailty tool in the ED, was also applied. The primary outcome was 180-day mortality; secondary outcomes included in-hospital and 90-day mortality, prolonged length of stay, home care referral, and ED revisit or hospital readmission. Logistic regression estimated associations between frailty and 180-day mortality, Kaplan-Meier curves illustrated survival across frailty levels. ROC analyses evaluated secondary outcomes. ResultsA total of 310 patients with a median age of 72 years, 58.1% were male. Frailty prevalence ranged from 53.9% (IVCF-20) to 60.1% (CFS). The IVCF-20 score was independently associated with 180-day mortality (adjusted OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 1.02-1.10; p = 0.002). Severely frail participants had an 8.4-fold higher risk of death than robust individuals (adjusted OR = 8.37; 95% CI = 2.20-31.81). Kaplan-Meier curves showed a graded mortality increase across IVCF-20 categories. Both instruments predicted secondary outcomes, though CFS demonstrated slightly better discrimination for mortality. ConclusionsIVCF-20 predicted 180-day mortality, home care referral, and ED revisit/readmission. Its rapid, judgment-free format supports its feasibility for frailty screening at the ED.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Geriatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.3%
4
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
6
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.9%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.8%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
10
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
12
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Experimental Gerontology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
15
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
16
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
17
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
24
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%