Back

Mitochondrial bioenergetic signatures differentiate asymptomatic from symptomatic Alzheimer's disease

Mandal, P.; Trushina, E.; Arnold, M.; Kaddurah-Daouk, R.; Baloni, P.

2025-11-06 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.11.04.686626 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Asymptomatic Alzheimers disease (AsymAD) refers to individuals who, despite exhibiting amyloid-{beta} plaques and tau pathology comparable to Alzheimers disease (AD), maintain cognitive performance similar to cognitively normal individuals. The resilience mechanism in these AsymAD individual remains understudied. We performed a systematic analysis comparing AsymAD and AD across multiple cohorts (ROSMAP, Banner and Mount Sinai), brain regions (BA6, BA9, BA36 and BA37) and neuronal and glial cell types using proteomics and transcriptomics data. AsymAD brains exhibited preserved mitochondrial bioenergetics, characterized by enhanced oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), electron transport chain (ETC) activity, fatty acid and lipid metabolism, and branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) utilization. Pathways regulating mitochondrial complex biogenesis and calcium homeostasis were also upregulated. Key mitochondrial proteins such as MRPL47, CPT2, BCAT2, and IDH2, were consistently upregulated in AsymAD, whereas MACROD1 was downregulated. At the cellular level, excitatory neurons, including superficial, mid-layer, and deep-layer subtypes, exhibited the most preserved mitochondrial function, whereas vulnerable inhibitory subtypes, including PVALB and SST neurons, showed increased cellular abundance and bioenergetic activity. In contrast, microglia and oligodendrocytes proportions were reduced in AsymAD relative to AD. Our findings identify preserved mitochondrial bioenergetics as a defining feature of resilience in AD and suggest that enhancing NADH metabolism via NAD+ precursor-based interventions may potentially help in maintaining cognitive function despite amyloid and tau pathology.

Published in Communications Biology (predicted rank #11) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.