Back

Skin lipid chemistry influences host-microbiome-pathogen interactions in snake fungal disease (ophidiomycosis)

Murphy, K. M.; Dallas, J. W.; Ghotbi, M.; Vargas-Gastelum, L.; Van Moorleghem, C.; Phillips, J. L.; Ludwig, D.; Sun, T.; Mason, R. T.; Niedzwiecki, J. H.; Parker, M. R.; Leblond, J. D.; Miller, J. M.; Stalzer, C.; Bergman, O.; Donahey, M. S. C.; Chevrette, M. G.; Walker, D. W.

2025-11-04 microbiology
10.1101/2025.11.04.686605 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Within host-microbiome-pathogen systems, the host chemical microenvironment is often overlooked despite its inherent role in host physiology. We used a multifaceted experimental approach encompassing culture-dependent and independent methods, metagenomic and genomic data, and deep neural network modeling to assess the impact of host skin lipid chemistry and the bacterial microbiome on the growth of Ophidiomyces ophidiicola (ophidiomycosis, snake fungal disease). Results suggest that host skin lipid chemistry (e.g., oleic acid, squalene) and bacteria isolated from wild snake skins (e.g., Chryseobacterium sp. and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia) suppress O. ophidiicola growth. Notably, the O. ophidiicola genome contains biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) that encode metabolites that may suppress host lipid production, facilitating fungal pathogenicity. The contrastive deep neural network produced a near-perfect alignment of snake skin lipid and microbiome profiles for both individual snakes and disease states. BGCs from bacterial genomes isolated from snake skin overlap with metagenome profiles from wild snakes and correlate with disease state. We highlight antifungal activity found in the diverse lipid milieu of snake skin and bacterial-fungal interactions (BFIs) that structure the skin microbiome. Our results illustrate a strong relationship among a fungal pathogen, the microbiome, and host skin lipid chemistry.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.