Flexibly Modeling Rare Variant Pathogenicity Improves Gene Discovery for Complex Traits
Schwartzentruber, J.; Fiziev, P.; McRae, J.; Ulirsch, J. C.; Farh, K. K.-H.
Show abstract
Rare variant burden tests can directly identify genes that influence complex traits, but their power is limited by our ability to separate functional from benign alleles. We introduce FlexRV, an approach that greatly improves the power to detect gene-based associations in rare variant aggregation tests by modelling nonlinear relationships between functional annotations and phenotype. Across 62 quantitative and 44 disease traits in the UK Biobank, we show that FlexRV outperforms previous approaches such as DeepRVAT, STAAR, and Regenie, discovering 51% more quantitative and 102% more disease trait associations than the widely used Regenie method. Compared to discoveries from other methods, gene-phenotype associations identified by FlexRV replicated at a higher rate in the independent All of Us cohort and were more highly enriched at genes nominated by common variant genome-wide association studies. We explore the genetic architecture of complex traits using FlexRV burden tests, finding nearly equal contributions from missense and loss of function variants to rare variant burden heritability. FlexRV weights can also be incorporated into rare variant polygenic scores, improving their ability to identify individuals with extreme phenotypes. Our study illustrates the benefits of modelling nonlinear relationships between annotated variant effects and their downstream phenotypes in rare variant studies.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterizing substructure via mixture modeling in large-scale genetic summary statistics 98%
- Shared components of heritability across genetically correlated traits 98%
- Enrichment analyses identify shared associations for 25 quantitative traits in over 600,000 individuals from seven diverse ancestries 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.