Personalized Machine Learning guided Intervention for Optimizing Lifestyle Behaviors in Depression
Nan, J.; Purpura, S.; Jaiswal, S.; Afshar, H.; Maric, V.; Manchanda, J.; Taylor, C. T.; Ramanathan, D.; Mishra, J.
Show abstract
ObjectivePersonalized data-driven interventions for depression are much needed. Here, we leveraged N-of-1 machine learning (ML) to optimally target behavioral lifestyle interventions for depression. Methods50 individuals with mild-to-moderate depression enrolled in the single-arm, open-label Personalized Mood Augmentation (PerMA) clinical trial (NCT05662254). Participants completed a two-week digital monitoring phase using smartphone-based ecological momentary assessments (EMAs, 4x/day) plus smartwatch tracking of mood and lifestyle factors (sleep/exercise/diet/social connection). Personalized ML models were generated from these data to identify lifestyle factors most predictive of individual mood, and results were translated to individualized mood augmentation plans (iMAPs) implemented by participants for six weeks with once-a-week health coach guidance. ResultsIntervention completers (n=40) showed significant reduction in depression symptoms (primary outcome self-rated PHQ9 -3.5{+/-}3.8, Cohens d=-0.89, CI [-1.25 -0.53], p<0.001; clinician-rated HDRS -7.2{+/-}6.8, d=-1.03, CI [-1.41 -0.65], p<1E-6) with benefits sustained up to 12-week follow-up. Co-morbid anxiety was also significantly reduced (GAD7: d=-0.85, CI [-1.2, -0.49], p<0.001) and quality of life improved (d=0.68, CI [0.33, 1.02], p<0.001). Additionally, objective cognitive measures impacted in depression including selective attention (d=0.51, CI [0.18, 0.84], p<0.001), interference processing (d=0.53, CI [0.2, 0.85], p<0.01) and working memory (d=0.66, CI [0.31, 0.99], p<0.001) showed significant enhancement. EMA tracking confirmed that improvement in depressed mood was specifically predicted by improvement in individually targeted lifestyles ({beta}=0.4{+/-}0.09, p<0.0005). ConclusionThe PerMA trial presents a robust personalized lifestyle intervention approach for depression and merits scale-up and RCT testing.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A computational approach to understanding effort-based decision-making in depression 94%
- A common symptom geometry of mood improvement under sertraline and placebo associated with distinct neural patterns 92%
- Self-blaming emotions in major depression: a randomised pilot trial comparing fMRI neurofeedback training with self-guided psychological strategies (NeuroMooD) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emotional Adaptation During A Crisis: Decline in Anxiety and Depression After the Initial Weeks of COVID-19 in the United States 93%
- Predicting remission after internet-delivered psychotherapy in patients with depression using machine learning and multi-modal data 93%
- Reliability of sucrose preference testing following short or no food and water deprivation - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of rat models of chronic unpredictable stress 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of Non-invasive Spinal Cord Stimulation in Unmedicated Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial and Induced Current Flow Pattern 93%
- Clinical Response to Neurofeedback in Major Depression Relates to Subtypes of Whole-Brain Activation Patterns During Training 92%
- Treating intrusive memories after trauma in healthcare workers: a Bayesian adaptive randomised trial developing an imagery-competing task intervention 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Heterogeneity in COVID-19 Pandemic-Induced Lifestyle Stressors and Predicts Future Mental Health in Adults and Children in the US and UK 93%
- Divergent transcriptomic profiles in depressed individuals with hyper- and hypophagia implicating inflammatory status 92%
- Uncovering relationships between 24-hour rest-activity patterns and immune-metabolic dysfunction in young people with mood disorders. 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.