Back

Deep Radiomics in 18F-FDG-PET/CT for Survival Prediction in Multiple Myeloma: Novel Embeddings Using A Foundational Models Memory

Guinea-Perez, J.; Uribe, S.; Peluso, S.; Castellani, G.; Nanni, C.; Alvarez, F.

2025-11-06 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2025.11.04.25339482 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo test whether internal memory states from a medical founda-tional segmentation model can serve as compact, mask-aware embeddings for predicting progression-free survival (PFS) in multiple myeloma (MM) from whole-body [18F]FDG PET/CT, and how late fusion of PET, CT, and clinical data enhances prognostic performance. MethodsWe analyzed 227 newly diagnosed MM patients with PET/CT and clinical data. For two regions of interest (spine-dilated and full skeleton), we prompted MedSAM2 slice-wise using mask-derived bounding boxes and cached the final spatio-temporal memory tensor per modality. We compared two downsampling strategy to obtain per-study embeddings: channelxmemory averaging with a small CNN head, and depth-attention pooling. PET and CT embeddings were combined by late fusion and passed to a DeepSurv head. We evaluated image-only and multimodal (image+clinical) models with stratified 5-fold cross-validation. The primary endpoint was Harrells c-index (mean {+/-} SE across folds). ResultsImage-only models using the averaging downsampler achieved up to 0.659 {+/-} 0.015 c-index (PET, spine-dilated), comparable to baseline ra-diomics results. Multimodal models improved discrimination to 0.710{+/-}0.032 (CT, spine-dilated), with similar performance for other PET/CT+clinical variants (0.703-0.710), improving clinical-only baselines [~] 6.5%. Averaging consistently outperformed depth-attention; concatenation and gated fusion performed comparably. PET outperformed CT within the same mask in image-only settings. ConclusionMask-aware memory embeddings extracted from a founda-tional segmentation model provide effective, data-efficient imaging biomark-ers for MM PFS and, when fused with routine clinical covariates, significantly improve risk stratification over clinical-only or radiomics baselines. This of-fers a practical path to prognostic modeling on small medical cohorts without feature design.

Published in Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 5%
19.2%
3
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
4
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
6
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
8
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
9
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
10
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.4%
15
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
21
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
23
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
25
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
27
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
30
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.5%