Back

Plasma Membrane TRPV4 Relocalization as a Mechanosensitive Prognostic Biomarker in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

Chan, C.; Arbzadeh, E.; Samankan, S.; Latham, P.; Schwartz, A.; Du, R.; Chung, I.

2025-11-05 oncology
10.1101/2025.11.04.25339245 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeReliable prediction of invasive progression remains an unmet need in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Conventional histologic grading provides limited prognostic value. Building on mechanistic evidence that cell crowding in confined ducts engages a TRPV4-dependent mechanotransduction program, we evaluated plasma-membrane TRPV4 (PM-TRPV4) relocalization as a mechanosensitive, patient-level prognostic biomarker for progression to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Experimental DesignIn a retrospective single-institution case-control study, we analyzed 44 patients with pure DCIS (24 progressed to IDC, 20 remained IDC-free [≥]5 years). Three board-certified pathologists independently scored PM-TRPV4 on whole-slide immunohistochemistry using a prespecified five-level membrane-localization rubric (linearly weighted Fleiss {kappa}=0.823, 95% CI 0.777-0.863). The primary endpoint was IDC-free survival assessed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox models with prespecified adjustment for histologic grade and estrogen receptor (ER) status. ResultsPM-TRPV4 positivity was associated with shorter IDC-free survival (log-rank p=0.040). In multivariable Cox models, PM-TRPV4 remained independently prognostic (adjusted HR=3.77; 95% CI 1.01-14.12; p=0.049) after accounting for grade and ER, whereas histologic grade itself was not prognostic (p=0.57). Restricting to lower-grade DCIS strengthened the association (OR=10.50, two-sided p=0.016) vs overall (OR=5.92, two-sided p=0.057). In lower-grade DCIS, 77.8% (14/18) of PM-TRPV4-positive cases progressed vs 25.0% (2/8) of PM-TRPV4-negative. ConclusionsPM-TRPV4 provides independent, mechanism-informed prognostic information beyond histologic grade and ER. Given the small, single-institution case-control design, findings are hypothesis-generating and support multi-institutional validation with standardized staining/scoring, external calibration, and [≥]10 years of surveillance, particularly to refine risk in lower-grade DCIS, where clinical decisions are most uncertain. Translational Relevance StatementCurrent DCIS management relies on histologic grade, which has variable reproducibility and offers little guidance for about 60% of patients with lower-grade disease. We show that plasma-membrane relocalization of TRPV4 (PM-TRPV4), a functional readout of pro-invasive mechanotransduction in crowded ducts, adds independent prognostic information beyond grade and ER. In our cohort (N=44; 24 events), PM-TRPV4 positivity was associated with shorter IDC-free survival and remained significant in multivariable models (adjusted HR 3.77; p=0.049), whereas grade was not prognostic. Exploratory analyses suggested larger effects in lower-grade DCIS (OR [~]10.5), identifying a subset at high risk (77.8% vs 25.0% progression). PM-TRPV4 achieved near-perfect inter-rater reliability (weighted kappa = 0.823) using standard IHC on routine FFPE sections, supporting practical deployent. If externally validated with standardized protocols and at least 10 years of surveillance, PM-TRPV4 testing could enable personalized risk stratification and help select lower-grade DCIS patients for active surveillance versus those requiring escalation.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
2
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.2%
3
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.2%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
5
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 18%
4.0%
7
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.6%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
12
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
13
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
16
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
21
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
23
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
24
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
25
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
27
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
29
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.7%