Back

All Memories Are Equal at Night: Sleep Protects Without Preference for Strength

Schabus, M.; Ameen, M. S.; Heib, D. P.

2025-11-04 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.11.03.686279 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Sleep benefits memory, but whether this benefit depends on initial memory strength remains heavily debated. We asked whether sleep preferentially stabilizes weakly versus strongly encoded declarative memories, and whether classical sleep oscillations contribute to this effect. Ninety healthy adults (n=30/group) learned 80 unrelated word pairs; half presented twice (weak, S-), and half three times (strong, S+). Participants were tested either immediately ([~]40 min post-learning), after 9 hours containing nocturnal sleep monitored with polysomnography, or after a comparable daytime waking period. Memory performance was assessed using cued recall accuracy and reaction times (RT). Strongly encoded items (S+) were recalled better than weakly encoded items (S-) across all groups. Overall memory performance was lowest after wakefulness, whereas performance after sleep was slightly higher than immediate recall. Crucially, wakefulness selectively impaired the consolidation of weak items, with the WAKE group forgetting disproportionately more S- than S+ items. In contrast, the SLEEP group retained weak and strong items similarly, yielding performance comparable to immediate recall. RT analyses showed generally slower responses for weak items, particularly after wakefulness, while response times in the sleep and immediate recall groups did not differ. Analyses of classical sleep features, such as slow oscillations density, sleep spindle intensity, and their coupling, revealed no significant associations with overnight retention. Correlations between these oscillations and memory performance were present both during the adaptation and the learning nights, suggesting trait-like, rather than state-dependent relationships. Overall, our findings indicate that sleep protects declarative memories irrespective of initial encoding strength.

Published in Journal of Sleep Research (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.