Patient-Level Stroke Outcomes Following Linkage of a Statewide Stroke Registry to Administrative Claims Data
Hailat, R.; Thompson, M. P.; Nickles, A.; Oostema, J. A.; de los Campos, G.; Reeves, M. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundCollection of patient-level outcomes data following hospital discharge is challenging for stroke registries. Data linkage to administrative claims data is a potential solution to obtain outcomes data. We aimed to generate data on 30-day, 90-day and 1-year outcome events following hospitalization for stroke using linked data in Michigan. MethodsWe probabilistically linked clinical data from a 5-year cohort (2016-2020) of all index acute stroke discharges (ICD-10 I61-I63) from 31 hospitals participating in Michigans Acute Stroke program (MiSP) to a representative statewide multi-payer claims database. We used the linked data to generate data on 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year event rates including hospital readmissions, stroke recurrence, post-acute care services (i.e., facility-based rehabilitation and home health), and out-patient visits. Mortality data was only available for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. Outcomes were stratified by age, race, stroke type, and stroke severity. ResultsOf the 46,330 MiSP stroke discharges, 23,918 (51.6%) were linked to the claims database. Readmission and stroke recurrence rates were 14.1% and 3.3%, respectively, at 30 days, increasing to 42.2% and 8.3% at one year. By 30 days about a quarter of subjects had used facility-based rehab and another quarter had used home health; home health utilization increased to 44.7% by one year. At all time points Black patients had significantly higher readmission rates compared to whites, but higher stroke recurrence rates were only observed at the 1-year mark. At 30 days, utilization of post-acute care services did not differ by race, but utilization rates were significantly higher in Blacks at 90 days and one year. In contrast utilization of outpatient services was significantly higher among White patients at all time points. ConclusionsLinkage between acute stroke registry and claims data provides an important source of surveillance data for stroke outcomes up to 1-year post discharge. This data allows for real-time monitoring of healthcare outcomes and potentially leads to interventions to improve stroke care.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Persistent Inequities in Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the U.S.: Results from the NIS 97%
- COVID-19 Infection Is Associated with Poor Outcomes in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage 96%
- Disparities in Access to Vascular Stroke Imaging and Carotid Revascularization: A Population Study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modified Rankin Scale Disability Status at Day 4 Poststroke is an Informative Predictor of Long-Term Day 90 Outcome 96%
- Documented Goals of Care Conversations with Hospitalized Patients after Severe Stroke 94%
- Vascular Risk Factor Prevalence and Trends in Native Americans With Ischemic Stroke - A National Inpatient Sample Analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors Associated with Stroke after COVID-19 Vaccination: A Statewide Analysis 94%
- Workflow Intervals andOutcomesof Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large-Vessel Occlusion During On- Versus Off-Hours in China The ANGEL-ACT Registry 94%
- Preliminary outcomes of combined treadmill and overground high-intensity interval training in ambulatory chronic stroke 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prehospital triage of intracranial hemorrhage and anterior large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke: the value of the rapid arterial occlusion evalution 96%
- Treatment of Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A 20-year National Inpatient Sample Review 94%
- Large Core Thrombectomy: Feasibility Of Simplified Protocol In Resource-Limited Settings 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.