Back

Building a Roadmap for Nutrition Education in Medical Training: Lessons from a Student-Led Pilot

Patel, A.; Modi, R.; McGonigle, W.; Agarwal, G.

2025-11-06 medical education
10.1101/2025.11.03.25339436 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPoor diet is the leading cause of global disability and premature death, contributing to 11 million deaths annually. Despite this, nutrition remains underemphasized in medical education, with over 70% of United States (U.S.) medical schools failing to meet the National Research Councils 1985 recommendation of 25 hours of nutrition training. In 2022, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bipartisan resolution calling for meaningful nutrition education for health professionals. Amid this gap, unreliable media sources frequently shape patient nutrition knowledge rather than professional sources such as registered dietitians or licensed physicians. Strengthening interprofessional collaboration with nutrition professionals could enhance dietary counseling and patient care. MethodsIn response, one student implemented a pilot three-part clinical nutrition lecture series at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine (UMMSM). Resulting student enthusiasm catalyzed the formation of a 50-member taskforce formed to expand and integrate nutrition longitudinally. A pre- and post-lecture survey around the first of three planned sessions (Npre = 98, Npost = 77) assessed knowledge, perceptions of nutrition training, and comfort with dietary counseling. ResultsKnowledge of evidence-based nutrition improved significantly (p < .001). Post-lecture, students reported greater confidence applying nutrition in clinical practice and increased interest in lifestyle medicine training (p < .001). ConclusionsThe first session enhanced students practical skills and understanding of nutritions role in health. This trajectory illustrates how even a small pilot can stimulate sustainable reform. We discuss key elements of an effective, multifaceted nutrition curriculum and propose a roadmap adaptable to other institutions.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.4%
2
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.4%
3
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
4
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
6
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
7
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.4%
9
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
10
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
11
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
12
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
13
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
14
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
15
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
16
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
18
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
22
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
23
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
26
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
28
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%