Back

Quantum Dot Encoding for In-Solution Single-Molecule Biomarker Counting in Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Kuo, C.-W.; Nalla, S.; Sarkar, S.; Lee, W.; Wang, L.; Kohli, M.; Smith, A. M.

2025-11-04 oncology
10.1101/2025.11.03.25339402 medRxiv
Show abstract

Digital assays are in wide development for biomarker quantification at the single-molecule level, but the common use of surface-pulldown steps limits both analytical sensitivity and throughput. Here, we develop surface-free, wash-free, in-solution assays with a sensitivity slope approaching unity for sequence-specific counting of microRNAs (miRs) relevant to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). These assays are enabled by DNA nanoflowers (DNFs) densely encoded with [~]200 fluorescent quantum dots (QDs) that assemble in situ stoichiometrically to miRs. The QD-DNFs are detected as single events in solution by fluorescence microscopy or flow cytometry without washing away unbound labels. A [~]50 aM limit of detection and high agreement with absolute target count (0.95) were achieved by machine learning-guided assay optimization, providing the potential for calibration-free measurements. Multiple miR sequences could be distinguished through ratiometric and colorimetric (5-color) QD signatures with a single excitation source for flexible detection scenarios in static solution or flow streams. The assays were applied for detecting exosomal miRs from small-volume plasma of mCRPC patients and showed strong agreement with RT-qPCR, but with more reliable detection of the trace prognostic biomarker miR-375. Consistent with our prior reports using large volume blood draws, higher plasma levels of miR-375 were associated with poor survival of patients with mCRPC. We anticipate that in-solution absolute counting of clinical biomarkers in plasma will enable robust molecular analysis of trace biomarkers needed for the translation of cancer precision medicine.

Published in ACS Nano (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.