Back

Prognostic impact of age and MDS-associated mutations in NPM1-mutated AML

Liu, V. M.; Othus, M.; Naru, J.; Ries, R.; Pogosova-Agadjanyan, E.; Appelbaum, F. R.; Chauncey, T. R.; Dietrich, E.; Erba, H. P.; Godwin, J. E.; Fitzgibbon, M. P.; Fang, M.; Lee, S. C.; Moseley, A.; Percival, M.-E.; Qin, G.; Radich, J. P.; Raychaudhuri, S.; Willman, C. L.; Meshinchi, S.; Stirewalt, D. L.

2025-11-06 hematology
10.1101/2025.11.03.25339099 medRxiv
Show abstract

Nucleophosmin-1 (NPM1) mutations define a major molecular subtype of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and is generally associated with favorable prognosis. However, the impact of myelodysplasia-associated mutations (MDSm+) on patient outcomes within this subgroup remains uncertain. We retrospectively analyzed 271 NPM1-mutated AML patients from three independent cohorts (SWOG, Fred Hutch, and Beat AML) to assess the prognostic significance of MDSm+ and its interaction with age. MDSm+ occurred in 17% of cases, most commonly involving SRSF2 and SF3B1. Although MDSm+ was associated with inferior overall survival compared to MDSm-in ELN2022 favorable-risk patients (HR 2.0, p=0.008), this effect was largely driven by worse outcomes in older patients ([≥]65 years) as older ELN22 favorable-risk patients had poor OS regardless of presence of MDSm+ compared to younger patients. After stratification of patients by age, there was not a significant difference between MDSm+ and MDSm-in either younger patients (HR 0.99, p=0.98) or older patients (HR 1.42, p=0.33). These findings indicate that MDSm+ in NPM1+ AML is not independently associated with adverse risk after adjusting for age and highlight the need for age-adjusted AML risk models.

Published in Blood Neoplasia · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.