A functional map of CDK-drug interactions at single amino acid resolution
Gould, S. I.; Acosta, J.; Bielo, L. B.; Jaboldinov, A.; Johnson, G. A.; Contreras, M. E.; Wuest, A. N.; Bremont, E.; Toure, M. A.; Xiang, Y.; Kozicka, Z.; Hemann, M. T.; Koehler, A. N.; Chandarlapaty, S.; Rivera, F. J. S.
Show abstract
Proteins that drive or support human disease phenotypes are attractive molecular targets for precision therapy, yet most are nominated by knockout studies and then targeted with drugs that inhibit core catalytic pockets. These strategies cannot resolve which residues are essential, whether non-catalytic sites offer better selectivity or potency, or identify on-target resistance mechanisms. We introduce a framework that integrates precision genome editing, mechanistically diverse therapeutics, and computational sequence-structure-function analysis to map protein essentiality and potential druggability at single amino acid resolution. Applying this framework across 9 cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and 15 cancer therapeutics--including ATP-competitive inhibitors, PROTACs, and molecular glue degraders--we identify shared and CDK-specific residues critical for cell fitness and drug response, including known resistance mutations and dozens of new variants. The resulting functional maps resolve residue- and mechanism-specific differences in the resistance spectra among agents targeting the same protein. We show that this iterative strategy can also uncover higher order interactions by performing intra- and extragenic epistasis screens to identify residues that mediate on-target and within-family cell fitness and drug resistance. Finally, we find evidence of novel CDK6 mutations in breast cancer patients and concordance between experimental and clinical correlates of response to CDK4/6 inhibitors. By mapping residue-level essentiality and forecasting therapy resistance mutations, target-drug interaction maps could inform clinical treatment and guide design of more selective therapeutic molecules.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- An integrative oncogene-dependency map identifies unique vulnerabilities of oncogenic EGFR, KRAS, and RIT1 in lung cancer 96%
- Resistance to targeted therapies as a multifactorial, gradual adaptation to inhibitor specific selective pressures 96%
- RNA folding kinetics control riboswitch sensitivity in vivo 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Select EZH2 inhibitors enhance the viral mimicry effects of DNMT inhibition through a mechanism involving calcium-calcineurin-NFAT signaling 96%
- Cancer-associated DNA Hypermethylation of Polycomb Targets Requires DNMT3A Dual Recognition of Histone H2AK119 Ubiquitination and the Nucleosome Acidic Patch 96%
- Conditional lethality profiling reveals anticancer mechanisms of action and drug-nutrient interactions 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.