Modelling Predictive Coding in the Primary Visual Cortex (V1): Layer 2/3 Circuits for Prediction Error Computation through Compartmentalized Spiking Neurons
Nemati, E.; Davey, C. E.; Meffin, H.; Burkitt, A. N.
Show abstract
Cortical Layer 2/3 has been consistently implicated as the locus of prediction-error signalling in hierarchical models of cortical sensory processing. However, the circuit mechanisms that generate biologically plausible prediction-error (PE) signals remain elusive. A spiking network model is presented here in which two-compartment excitatory pyramidal neurons interact with three inhibitory subtypes: parvalbumin-expressing (PV), somatostatin-expressing (SOM), and vasoactive-intestinal-peptide-expressing (VIP) interneurons, to compute sign-specific prediction errors (positive and negative PEs). Feedforward input targets the soma, whereas top-down feedback reaches the distal apical dendrite, enabling a local somato-dendritic comparison. A PE emerges whenever the balance between excitation and inhibition is selectively disrupted within one compartment, recruiting either positive-error (PE+) or negative-error (PE-) subpopulations of pyramidal neurons. Unlike prior learning-dependent, rate-based accounts, this fixed-weight spiking circuit shows that bidirectional PE signals (PE+ and PE-) can arise online from compartment-specific balance without any synaptic weight updates. The model reproduces key experimental observations, including sparse mismatch responses, compartment-specific inhibition, and VIP-mediated disinhibition. Across four canonical sensory-prediction configurations, the circuit maintains a tight balance during matched input and generates bidirectional PE signals only under mismatch. By routing sensory drive from Layer 4 into Layer 2/3 and allowing the resulting PE activity to project toward deeper feedback generators, the model situates Layer 2/3 as a dedicated, feature-specific mismatch detector within a hierarchical inference network. These results provide a mechanistic bridge from dendritic computation to laminar predictive coding, demonstrating how realistic spiking dynamics can implement fast, sign-specific PE signaling without learning. Author summaryIn this study, we present a biologically grounded spiking model of layer 2/3 in primary visual cortex within the predictive coding framework. Our goal is to explain how superficial cortical circuits compute fast, sign-specific prediction errors when sensory input does not match top-down expectations. The model uses two-compartment pyramidal neurons whose somata receive feedforward drive from layer 4 while apical dendrites receive feedback, together with three key inhibitory interneuron classes, parvalbumin-expressing (PV), somatostatin-expressing (SOM), and vasoactive-intestinal-peptide-expressing (VIP), that provide compartment-specific inhibition and disinhibition. When input and prediction match, excitation and inhibition remain tightly balanced and activity is sparse; when they differ, this balance is transiently broken in the appropriate compartment, and distinct populations signal either a positive error (unexpected presence) or a negative error (unexpected absence). The circuit reproduces several in vivo observations in layer 2/3, including sparse mismatch responses, compartment-specific inhibition, and VIP-mediated disinhibition, and it does so without requiring synaptic weight changes. By routing feature-selective signals from layer 4 into layer 2/3 and relaying the resulting errors toward deeper layers, the model positions layer 2/3 as a local, feature-specific mismatch detector in a hierarchical system. This work provides a concrete, testable mechanism linking dendritic computation, inhibitory diversity, and predictive coding in the cortex.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Uncertainty-modulated prediction errors in cortical microcircuits 97%
- Interacting rhythms enhance sensitivity of target detection in a fronto-parietal computational model of visual attention 96%
- Discriminating neural ensemble patterns through dendritic computations in randomly connected feedforward networks 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.