Functional clusters for shape, texture, and motion encoding in macaque V2
Kim, T.; Kamath, R.; Hatanaka, G.; Namima, T.; Dylla, C.; Bair, W.; Pasupathy, A.
Show abstract
Macaque primary visual cortex (V1) exhibits exquisite columnar organization, while midlevel area V4 does not. Here we investigated the functional organization and representational bases of intervening area V2 with high-density Neuropixels recordings and a variety of visual stimuli--shape, texture, drifting grating, and translational motion patches. We observed dense clusters of similarly tuned neurons often spanning [~]500 {micro}m for shape and motion stimuli, and larger for texture stimuli, consistent with a columnar structure. In terms of representational bases, V2 responses were largely explained by stimulus features based on local image statistics: shape tuning is well-modeled by a linear combination of orientation filters, and direction selectivity is stronger with surface compared to object motion, in striking contrast to V4. Overall, our results support the progression from columns to sparse clusters as neuronal representations transform from encoding local features and feature conjunctions in V1/V2 to a high-dimensional object-based code in V4. Significance StatementBy recording hundreds of neurons simultaneously across layers of macaque visual area V2, we show the first evidence of exquisite fine-scale functional clusters that encode higher-order shape, texture, and motion features, extending well beyond the classic orientation-selective columns seen in area V1. Comparative analyses with V4 further reveal distinct representational bases and organization patterns between adjacent cortical areas, offering insights into how columnar organization is preserved in early visual areas (V1 and V2) but markedly attenuated in higher-order cortex such as V4.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.