The Silent Signal: Unmasking Myocardial Ischemia in a Resting Heartbeat with Machine Learning
Marzoog, B. A.; Kopylov, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundIschemic heart disease (IHD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, imposing a staggering burden on healthcare systems and societies. AimsTo assess the diagnostic capabilities of the single lead electrocardiography in the diagnosis of IHD using the machine learning model. Materials and methodsA prospective, non-randomized, minimally invasive, single-center, case-control study enrolled male and female participants aged [≥]40 years. All participants underwent resting single-lead electrocardiography (SLECG) and pulse wave recording using a portable Cardio-Qvark(R) device, and stress computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging with vasodilation test. Based on coronary computed tomography perfusion (CTP) results, 80 participants were stratified into two groups: Group 1 with stress-induced myocardial perfusion defect (n = 31) and Group 2 without stress-induced myocardial perfusion defect (n = 49). Statistical processing carried out using the R programming language v4.2, Python V.3, Statistica 12 programme. (StatSoft, Inc. (2014). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 12. www.statsoft.com.), and SPSS IBM version 28. P considered statistically significant at <0.05. ResultsThe best model performance in the diagnosis of IHD was Random Forest model. The model showed a diagnostic accuracy based on the parameters of the SLECG, AUC 0.988 [95 % confidence interval (CI); 0.967-1.000], Sensitivity 0.871 [95 % CI; 0.739-0.971], Specificity 0.959 [ 95 % CI; 0.894-1.000]. ConclusionThis study demonstrates that machine learning analysis of resting single-lead ECG signals, acquired via the portable Cardio-Qvark(R) device, achieves near-perfect accuracy (AUC 0.988) in diagnosing ischemic heart disease validated against myocardial perfusion imaging.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Fairness in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Assessing sex and racial bias in deep learning-based segmentation 96%
- Deep learning-based end-to-end automated stenosis classification and localization on catheter coronary angiography 96%
- Algorithm for Predicting Valvular Heart Disease from Heart Sounds in an Unselected Cohort 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- International Evaluation Of An Artificial Intelligence-Powered Ecg Model Detecting Occlusion Myocardial Infarction 97%
- Using ECG Machine Learning for Detection of Cardiovascular Disease in African American Men and Women: the Jackson Heart Study 96%
- Simple Models Versus Deep Learning in Detecting Low Ejection Fraction From The Electrocardiogram 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-Invasive Scale Measurement of Cardiac Output Compared with the Gold-Standard Direct Fick Method: A Feasibility Study 96%
- Treatment of Slow-flow After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Flow-mediated Hyperemia. The Randomized RAIN-FLOW Study 95%
- Smartwatch Facilitated Remote Health Care for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Amid COVID-19 Pandemic 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Patients with Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction 97%
- Prognostic value of compact myocardial thinning in patients with left ventricular non-compaction 95%
- Multiple Biomarkers to Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Myocardial performance improvement after iron replacement in heart failure patients: The IRON-PATH II echo-substudy 95%
- Screening for Right Ventricular Dysfunction in the Emergency Department Using a Smartphone ECG Analysis Application: An External Validation Study with Acute Pulmonary Embolism Patients 95%
- Risk Prediction of Coronary Artery Spasm in Patients Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Using a Comprehensive Clinical, Laboratory and Echocardiographic Diagnostic Score 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.