Back

Infant gut microbiota in multi-child families converges with adults without a sibling-specific signature

Hanski, E.; Ponsero, A. J.; Kolho, K.-L.; de Vos, W. M.; Salonen, A.

2025-11-01 microbiology
10.1101/2025.10.31.685886 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The human gut microbiota undergoes rapid development during early life. Sibling presence has been associated with altered infant microbiota composition and accelerated maturation, but distinguishing direct microbial transmission between siblings from confounding by maternal reproductive history (parity) remains challenging. We analysed >5,000 faecal samples from >800 mother-father-infant triads in the Finnish HELMi birth cohort to characterise microbiota patterns that could inform underlying mechanisms. While sibling presence was associated with accelerated microbiota maturation and modest compositional differences, infants who both had siblings (or both lacked siblings) were no more similar to each other than mixed pairs. Instead, infants with siblings exhibited non-specific convergence with adult microbiota profiles and contributed fewer unique genera to their family metacommunities (infant-mother-father triads). Multi-child families harboured smaller but compositionally distinct metacommunities. These patterns challenge simple models of direct sibling transmission and suggest that multiple factors associated with family structure may jointly influence infant microbiota development, though specific mechanisms remain unclear.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 8%
18.8%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Microbiome
○ 154 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.8%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Gut Microbes
○ 78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.0%
Similar papers in this journal
4
mBio
● 833 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.3%
Similar papers in this journal
5
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.6%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 19%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Microbiology
○ 155 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.1%
8
mSystems
● 394 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 17%
3.2%
10
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.4%
11
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.2%
12
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
○ 58 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
13
The ISME Journal
◐ 228 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
14
Cell Host & Microbe
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
● 393 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.4%
17
Microbiology Spectrum
● 469 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
18
mSphere
● 302 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
19
Molecular Ecology
○ 336 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
PNAS Nexus
◐ 159 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
Cell Reports Medicine
○ 153 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
22
PLOS Biology
● 486 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
● 72 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Microbiology
○ 427 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
25
Genome Medicine
○ 183 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
26
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.6%
27
Nature
○ 645 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
28
Nature Medicine
○ 125 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.