Physical mechanisms of nanoparticle-membrane interactions: A coarse-grained study
Paesani, M.; Ilie, I. M.
Show abstract
Nanoparticles (NPs) are promising drug carriers for targeted therapies, diagnostic imaging and advanced vaccines. However, their clinical translation is limited by complex biological barriers that reduce cellular uptake and efficacy. Specifically, the interaction with the cellular membrane controls nanoparticle adhesion, wrapping or full engulfment, which ultimately govern nanoparticle internalization efficiency. Flexible nanocarriers (e.g. liposomes, polymeric, micelles) are particularly attractive because their deformability could help them enhance the probability of successful cellular entry. To understand the physical mechanisms associated with cellular uptake, we investigate the interaction of semi-flexible nanocarriers with a symmetric lipid bilayer using coarse-grained simulations. We represent a flexible nanoparticle using the previously introduced MetaParticle (MP) model and the membrane using the Cooke-Deserno model. By systematically varying nanoparticle properties, i.e., adhesion strength and topology, we identify distinct interaction regimes ranging from surface adhesion and trapping to complete wrapping and endocytosis. These regimes correlate with nanoparticle shape, size and surface properties, providing quantitative design principles for optimizing cellular uptake. Overall, this framework offers predictive insight into how the interplay between nanoparticle properties and membrane interaction governs cellular internalization, informing the rational design of next-generation soft nanocarriers.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Particle deformability enables control of interactions between membrane-anchored nanoparticles 96%
- Simulation of FUS protein condensates with an adapted coarse-grained model 96%
- Efficient quantification of lipid packing defect sensing by amphipathic peptides; comparing Martini 2 & 3 with CHARMM36 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.